Is eating intelligent beings evil?

Back in 2e I had a character who had spent his life as an alchemist (a sociopathic one--on which more in a moment). He was particularly fond of turning other people gaseous and then breathing them. He managed to acquire all sorts of weird ways of going about this; usually involving breathing in parts at a time.

Anyway, he went utterly mad doing this; he became addicted to the process as he had the most remarkable dreams every time he slept after he did this.

I played the character as a thief living on the street--years after he'd been banned from ever working in a lab. I played him as a raving lunatic who was always looking out for another chance to find ways to distill others into gas. He had powerful memories of the dreams that he'd had, and they drove him to continue to try to figure a way to get back to this. The DM did a great job describing other people to me when I played this character. The DM would point out what likely properties they'd have as contributors to his dreams.

Anyway, this character was certainly evil, in that he was killing those that he breathed, and that he was doing all of this for entirely unnecessary reasons. However, he didn't see himself as evil. He didn't even see himself as unfortunate or unusual. He saw everyone else as potentially contributing to his own experiences.

Needless to say, this guy wasn't much of a group member, and it didn't take long before I could only play him when I played one-on-one sessions with the DM, and it didn't take long for this guy to end up getting his head bashed in. But, it was a very interesting playing experience to try to play such a character.

Dave
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I come from a culture where Cannabalism was still being practiced up until the 1920's and the last 'known' cannabals died in the 1950's. The stance of the culture (at the time) was that those who practiced ritual cannabalism (ie the eating of enemy eyeballs after battle etc) or social cannabalism (ie the rare slave/enemy feast) were fine upstanding members of the community:), however those who actively hunted and killed people to eat were delinquent. Of course the Europeans who colonised this country thought it was evil:(

As for Kobolds I'd say its not an evil act for them but it would be for mainstream DnD humans (as opposed to Barbarian tribes).

The other issue of course is the plethora of intelligent monsters that inhabit DnD worlds - anything over Int 3 is sentient including Giant Owls, Pegasi, and Awakened Beef (oops cattle)

PS IMC All with the Barbarian class are Cannabals - its the source of their rage ability
 

Geoff Watson said:
I've heard of this sort of thing. It's mainly an exageration; some cultures ate small bits of fallen enemies in such a manner, but cannibalism is very unhealty, which is the main reason it's taboo.
Nutritionally or ethically/morally unhealthy?

Although I'm sure their diet are not based solely on human flesh ("I prefer the taste of liver with fava bean"), nor it is a daily regimen. They probably eat it as a feasting dish, like turkey on Thanksgiving, or roast pig at Hawaiian luau celebration.
 


Ranger REG said:
Nutritionally or ethically/morally unhealthy?

Although I'm sure their diet are not based solely on human flesh ("I prefer the taste of liver with fava bean"), nor it is a daily regimen. They probably eat it as a feasting dish, like turkey on Thanksgiving, or roast pig at Hawaiian luau celebration.

Nutritionally.

You're probably right about it only being done on special occasions.

Geoff.
 

takyris said:
The answer more or less wound down to "Respectful killing and eating is fine, if it's part of the natural order. Killing somebody for fun is worse than killing somebody for food."

[Shrug] Personal opinion.
 


Remove ads

Top