Cerubus Dark
First Post
Wait, its Hong right, please say its Hong.
No, Bugaboo was not Hong. Hong is a goof, but not enough of a misanthrope to make an effective Bugaboo.Cerubus Dark said:Wait, its Hong right, please say its Hong.
Firebird said:Someone was actually rude enough to claim your DM skills were lessened by using published modules in your campaign? I have been playing this game for over twenty years and I've seen my periods of free time grow shorter and shorter as I've matured (full-time job, demands of children, etc.) and it is no longer possible for me to detail my adventures to the extent I used to be able to. These days, more often than not, I've got little more than a rough outline of the plot, a map, and a lot of experience at winging it. I freely scan stat blocks out of any source I can lay my hands on, tweak them to fit my game, and run with them.
QUOTE]
Frickin ditto, kill the bastard who said it. maybe a well placed spiked pit trap.
Feck you, sister.Buttercup said:No, Bugaboo was not Hong. Hong is a goof, but not enough of a misanthrope to make an effective Bugaboo.
Originally Posted by LostSoul
Yes. If the players have to do the work at the table, roleplaying and everything, then the GM should do his part and actually sit down and write and adventure for them.
Originally Posted by dead
Is it cheating for a GM to use a published adventure?
No, hong and Bugaboo were once co-habitants of the boards a the same time.Buttercup said:No, Bugaboo was not Hong. Hong is a goof, but not enough of a misanthrope to make an effective Bugaboo.
Based on this thread and the other "cheating" thread you started, I think you hang around with a bunch of nitwits.dead said:What do others think?