Ironically, many of those incessant polls seem to have been started by a poster who loves 4e and believes that all those who don't are ignorant and haven't even read or played the 4e rules (and is hoping to prove this via the polls). The number of posts by those who are baiting the other side is roughly even, though there seem to be more coming from the rabidly-pro-4e side than the rabidly-anti-4e side, simply because the former is larger.Wisdom Penalty said:You won't find me, as far as I can recall, saying a bad thing about either of those systems. It's like talking about an ex-girlfriend - nothing good can come of it, and few folks really care.
So, I guess I'm saying - Yes. An emphatic yes. I will let those who choose to play different systems do so in peace. I am Wisdom Penalty; hear me roar.
Let's hope for some reciprocity, eh?
Wis
Wisdom Penalty said:Dude, that's awesome. In my system, any time a WWF anecdote can be used in a discussion, the poster gains +2d6 cool points.
Zerakon said:To be honest, as a casual EN Worlder, it is these rhetorical, non-substantive threads are what turn me off of EN World lately. There are far more interesting, substantive threads here but they don't seem to get as much interest, and fall off the main page. There are exceptions, but it's getting tiresome wading through the trash to find a few threads of value.
Can those that have decided to move forward with 3e/3.5 be left in peace?Wisdom Penalty said:Can those that have decided to move forward with 4e be left in peace?