FreeTheSlaves
Adventurer
Hi all,
I'm (finally - hooray!) playing a PC, a human paladin to be exact, and the dm has given warning that my guy may be a little "too balanced" to thrive in 4E.
The basic build:
Loric
Human paladin 1
str 16, con 12, dex 13, int 10, wis 14, cha 14
Skills: religion +5, history +5, diplomacy +7, insight +7, endurance +6
Admitted weaknesses:
Anyway, I think this guy will do fine enough.
Thoughts?
I'm (finally - hooray!) playing a PC, a human paladin to be exact, and the dm has given warning that my guy may be a little "too balanced" to thrive in 4E.
The basic build:
Loric
Human paladin 1
str 16, con 12, dex 13, int 10, wis 14, cha 14
Skills: religion +5, history +5, diplomacy +7, insight +7, endurance +6
Admitted weaknesses:
- Stats - feat requirements, desirable class features, skill choices & role playing considerations mean that they're spread real thin. Nothing higher than a base 14.
- Race - chosen for role playing considerations, but stat choices will make the 3rd (charisma based) at-will a seldom used feature. More importantly, such a MAD class punishes only 1 stat being boosted by race.
- Skills - 3 of them are necessary for the desired character, but key off low bonus stats.
Anyway, I think this guy will do fine enough.
Thoughts?