Is this monk still Lawful?

[Scion]

to add to scion's list

then no spellcaster should be lawful since almost all spells have a random effect (magic missile 1d4 =1 per missile, cure light wounds 1d8 +1 , etc.)

oohh.. and the prismatic spells

 

[werk]

to add to scion's list

then no spellcaster should be lawful since almost all spells have a random effect (magic missile 1d4 =1 per missile, cure light wounds 1d8 +1 , etc.)

Why add to a completely irrelevant correllation?

 

[Infiniti2000]

Why add to a completely irrelevant correllation?

'Cause they like tweakin' ya.

 

[Scion]

Why add to a completely irrelevant correllation?

well, I was just showing how irrelevant your arguement was

 

[Zandel]

Well said.. Three chears for Scion!

.....
...
..
.

Ok now that that's over with. How can there even be a dispute? As posted the monk isn't breaking any personal code or the code of his order so he's lawful...

 

[Viktyr Gehrig]

Ok now that that's over with. How can there even be a dispute? As posted the monk isn't breaking any personal code or the code of his order so he's lawful...

He is still willfully endangering and hampering his teammates in combat.

If they were his disposable minions, that would be justifiable as Lawful Evil-- but they're people who, presumably, his continued survival relies upon.

 

[irdeggman]

He is still willfully endangering and hampering his teammates in combat.

If they were his disposable minions, that would be justifiable as Lawful Evil-- but they're people who, presumably, his continued survival relies upon.

Alright, please explain to me using the SRD (or rulebooks for that matter with pg numbers so I can look it up to better understand the basis) - where "endangering and hampering" are properties of the lawful/chaos axis.

They are, (see SRD quote previously) however definitely along the good/evil axis (well the endangering part at least).