Jason Bulmahn Speaks about DDXP(His take on the system)

Shadeydm said:
This was already addressed in 3.x its called a reserve feat.

The cute little $ symbol you have under your moniker proceeding the word sceptic, would be much more appropriate to 5th edition, you know, the shape?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

kristov said:
#2. i really do believe that if pazio doesnt jump on the 4e wagon and ride it with WOTC they will tank.

This will be true for most publishers out there. fact is our wonderful gaming market is really quite small and its hard hard hard to make a living in it without following along with the big dogs.

I havent played 4e and am not saying I approve of it, but seriously, business sense kicks in and says this isnt a choice. You don't bite the hand that feeds you unless your tired of being fed.

I have to disagree with this. I think there will be a market for 3.x stuff after 4.0 comes out. As with previous editions there will be people still playing 3.x as there are people playing every previous version of D&D. My old game group just switched to 3.x back in October of last year after playing 2nd all these past years and only changed because the DM who was stuck on 2nd finally decided to change over. Course now that he finally left it behind the group is more willing to move to 4.0 since it is so close and they won't have to buy as many books to start (not everyone has bought their books yet as they've only been playing one mod and could go back to 2nd). There are players out there though who will never change for the most part and some of those will buy 4.0 to check it out even though they might never play it. Not to mention a lot of the popular secondary 3.x systems (WoW RPG, Midnight, Conan, etc) have gone OGL so their players don't need to switch to 4.0 if they don't want too. There will be a market, just not as big as before, but probably enough to sustain a few companies.
 

Steely Dan said:
The cute little $ symbol you have under your moniker proceeding the word sceptic, would be much more appropriate to 5th edition, you know, the shape?

Yeah... but the dollar symbol is shift-4. Hmmmmmm... I'm thinking CONSPIRACY! ;)
 

Steely Dan said:
The cute little $ symbol you have under your moniker proceeding the word sceptic, would be much more appropriate to 5th edition, you know, the shape?
This isn't the place to whine about other people's custom titles.



Back to the thread at hand, I thought was Jason said was certainly interesting. I also didn't see it as a "review" in any way - just his 'feelings' on a blog (isn't that what a lot of blogs are for?). In any case, more information is always good.
 

dm4hire said:
There will be a market, just not as big as before, but probably enough to sustain a few companies.

Well, if 50%* of your market is switching to a new format and abandoning the old one, can you survive on the remaining 50% that is left?

That is the question these companies need to ask themselves if they don't plan on supporting 4.0.

Honestly, the rules aren't that amazingly different that it is entirely possible for a company to write adventures without any stat blocks in the main part of the adventure and just put the stats/combat tactics of the monsters in the back of the mod, in both formats. By the way 4e looks to be turning out, it would be a simple matter without need of advancing monsters since you can just select from a list of similar ones. Something like, "If using 4e rules, instead of the advanced gibbering monster of legend, use Aberrant Morass, boss monster, page 296 of the 4e MM".

* 50% is a number totally pulled out of the air, but it's a nice conservative estimate. Going by my personal circle of gaming friends and acquaintances though, that number is closer to 95%.
 



I'm sure there's enough 3e market remaining to support a few companies.

I'm not sure there's enough 3e market to support Paizo.

We're not exactly talking about a basement pdf operation here.
 

Shadeydm said:
This was already addressed in 3.x its called a reserve feat.

Which, while nice, and while I am a fan of them...lag pretty heavily in usefulness pretty quickly. By higher levels, there's really no point to them.

Reserve feats were a good idea, not a solution to any problem by any means.
 

The companies I see continuing on will be those who have already broken from the pack. They might do some 4e stuff, but for the most part will probably keep doing what they have been doing. Companies like Green Ronin, Mongoose, and Fantasy Flight already have 3.x related independent products holding up on their own and continue that way.

Don't forget players who will play more than one game system. I've bought enough variety stuff over the years to keep a few manufacturers in business for a couple of years at least. Some will be willing to continue playing 3.x while moving on to 4.0.

The fact we don't know about the guessed statistics mentioned is out of that 50% or even 5%, how much of that will be pre-existing market already. If they aren't losing their market then there will be nothing to gain by moving to 4.0. Also some companies have developed a good enough reputation that some fans will buy the product anyway just converting it over. Another defining issue will be the new GSL, or whatever acronym WotC finally settles on, and if it will allow companies to still work with the OGL or not. If it does then I see companies like GR modeling Freeport stuff to work with both products if only posting conversion information on their website. Chris Pramas has already mentioned to some extent that this element will be one of the deciding factors for them. How much or to what extent we'll have to wait and see once they decide.

The allowance of the OGL will be an important aspect also. It has been both a blessing and a curse to the industry as we've seen. We've all seen how it has raised companies out of the ranks while crushing others. WotC needs as many people on board 4e as possible because of that. A company, because of the OGL, actually has the potential to destroy D&D if you really think about it. All it takes is for someone to come out with a game concept based on the OGL that everyone likes more than D&D and it would be game over. Think WoW when it emerged compared to EQ, most figured it would do well, but I don't think anyone really expected it to do as well as it has, coming to dominate the MMO industry. Both are online games, both play similar for the most part, and so there is no reason they shouldn't be running neck and neck other than people like playing WoW more than playing EQ or any other MMO for that matter. The more companies WotC gets onboard with 4e though, the less likely people will remember the OGL down the road, and the less likely something like this will happen. However if WotC denies it outright the decision will probably hurt them as everyone I mentioned rely on their dominate products, which all depend upon the OGL, and having to shutdown their main cash flow will be a big turn off.

I'm looking forward to 4e, but it has to live up to what has been promised and everyone has got to get on board if you look at it from a business sense thanks to the OGL. Small companies eking a living off the OGL and 3.x related stuff isn't the worry and they will thrive, thanks to those few who remain behind, without any problems. The whole thing reminds me of a Greek tragedy in how the hero does something he thinks is helpful, but in the end it comes back to bite him. I am interested in seeing how everything turns out come this time two years from now, finding out who lives or dies because of 4e.

Please realize the companies I've mentioned have found niche markets for themselves and are used as examples. Fantasy Flight Games have Midnight covering dark epic fantasy, Green Ronin has Mutants & Masterminds covering super heroes and True20 which has grown into its own game system but still based on 3.x for the most part, and Mongoose has Conan covering bloody epic fantasy. I almost forgot Sword & Sorcery has the World of Warcraft RPG put out through White Wolf.
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top