Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law

[The Firebird]

On the plus side, 28% get it right. Given that ChatGPT entered the public awareness 3 years ago, and that honestly it's not intuitive, having one person in four already understanding it is not that bad. Sure 3-out-of-4 persons will think it either stores all the data intact to regurgitates it or have a little tiny human in the computer typing an answer (those 6% must be the one who ascribe intent to it, after all, the tiny human might be a mean tiny human) so it's still worth reiterating how it works, but I don't think we had 28% of people understanding how the Internet worked in 1995.

Gonna be honest--I don't really know the Internet works now. And I think that's true for most technologies, because the world is so complicated now. There's just not that many hours in a day, and I don't need that much detail.

I guess text prediction is a low bar to clear though. I think I have that level of understanding re: internet.

 

[Umbran]

Certain. The dump truck only comes by occasionally, while the Internet is providing a steady stream of crap.

But, that sounds like a sewer... which is a network of tubes...