Charlaquin
Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
Assuming I was running a Dragonlance game, sure. I don’t know why I would ever do that, but hypothetically.
Assuming I was running a Dragonlance game, sure. I don’t know why I would ever do that, but hypothetically.
Not to mention "Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure".I voted no.
You missed the "burn it with fire" and "hell no" options.
I will buy the gas. And dibs on the op minis.I voted no.
You missed the "burn it with fire" and "hell no" options.
If i would happen to DM a DL campaign, then of course, in FR definitely not, but i voted yes since i assume you meant that?Seriously. I want to know. If you were the DM of a game, would you allow me to play a Kender PC?
i, as a dm who tends to restrict race selection (and have been criticized for that in this forum) to meet the campaign flavor, but for sure would allow a kender in a DL campaign, would ask you:tl;dr, If the Kender survives session zero, then I'd be ok with it.
I ask all players to come to the Session Zero without any preconceived characters that they want to play. First listen to the setting (and also give feedback on it - it's two-way world-building), then figure out what you play.
If there are then good reasons to play a Kender, then we can talk. But everyone - not just the DM - should agree. I also want to hear from all players why their characters would team up with this Kender, and I want to hear from the Kender why (s)he would hang out with the others. If that all works out, then I am all for it. But that means that all other characters are up-to-date on the peculiarities of the Kender. It means that the Kender-player must explain up front how the characteristics of the Kender will be played. And that most likely means the chaotic-stupid character idea will get vetoed, but the what-could-possibly-go-wrong-adventurer may be embraced by the others.