D&D 3E/3.5 Knightfall's "Humanoids + Templates = Fun" Thread (Retired)

[Krishnath]

Hmm, remember this...

Kit's Animals & Vermin + Templates = Sadistic Fun thread
http://www.enworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=52151

Nope, not until you mentioned it. Shouldn't prevent of from doing a new one though.

Buddha the DM: Now where would the fun be in that. Not that many dragons to begin with

 

[Buddha the DM]

Buddha the DM: Now where would the fun be in that. Not that many dragons to begin with

So? Has that ever stopped any of us before?

 

[Krishnath]

So? Has that ever stopped any of us before?

No, but it wouldn't be fun. And fun is important, thus we need to choose a creature type with a lot of variation among it, such as animals, magical beasts, or even outsiders...

 

[Buddha the DM]

How wouldn't it be fun?

Personally I like dragons, and would love to see a thread for them similar to this one.

 

[BOZ]

krishnath hates dragons, from everything i've seen.

 

[Krishnath]

Boz: Lol!

Buddha the DM: Because there is a severe lack of dragons compared to other creature types, and there is a lot of work that is involved in the true dragons. Trust me on this, it is what I do when I am bored. Aberrations would be a good alternative, there are a lot of different types of those...

 

[Knightfall]

Boz: Lol!

Buddha the DM: Because there is a severe lack of dragons compared to other creature types, and there is a lot of work that is involved in the true dragons. Trust me on this, it is what I do when I am bored. Aberrations would be a good alternative, there are a lot of different types of those...

I like the idea of and Aberrations thread. I'll like it even more once I get my hands on Lods of Madness. I also think a Dragon or Elemental thread would be kind of interesting.

The only rule, I see is that an Aberration thread must either use a base creature that is an Aberration or use a template or series of templates that turns a base creature into a Aberration. of course, the same goes if we choose something else.

Cheers!

KF72

p.s. I've started updating and compiling my old 3.0 creations from this thread and a few others. I've only done a few, so far, but once I get more than, say, 10 to 20 done, I'll post them to the Homebrews forum again in a different thread. I'll also be posting a compiled Word Document, eventually. (I've found that many of my creations need to be reimagined completely, as a lot of changes happened from 3.0 to 3.5, regarding monsters.)

 

[Krishnath]

The only rule, I see is that an Aberration thread must either use a base creature that is an Aberration or use a template or series of templates that turns a base creature into a Aberration.

Start the thread and I am *so* there.

 

[Buddha the DM]

Buddha the DM: Because there is a severe lack of dragons compared to other creature types, and there is a lot of work that is involved in the true dragons. Trust me on this, it is what I do when I am bored. Aberrations would be a good alternative, there are a lot of different types of those...

I know there is a lack of the Dragon type. I create them when I'm bored too, although the boredom tends to cure itself before I can finish them.

The only rule, I see is that an Aberration thread must either use a base creature that is an Aberration or use a template or series of templates that turns a base creature into a Aberration. of course, the same goes if we choose something else.

I think the same rule could apply to the Dragon thread.

 

[Knightfall]

Start the thread and I am *so* there.

Ok, we'll go with Aberrations and see how far it goes. I will start a new thread. The thread won't start with a templated critter from me, however, as I'm working on updating a critter from this thread, right now, and I have to go to physiotherapy. (Different pain issue than detailed before on this thread.)

If someone wants to start a Dragon thread too then I'm all for that, as well.

Cheers!

KF72