Law Enforcement: Taser debut zapped

Angel Tarragon

Dawn Dragon
This just in from Brandon Sun Online:

Written by Ian Hitchen of Brandon Sun
Crime-fighting devices that could help cops tame unruly crooks won’t be part of the local police force’s arsenal any time soon, in part because of ongoing budget woes.

Brandon Police Service Sgt. Larry Yanick said the debut of Tasers, controversial devices that immobilize a person with an electrical current, has been delayed.

“We haven’t shelved the idea of using Tasers, we are still behind the Taser project,” Yanick said. “That has been temporarily put on hold or delayed, I guess, until next year.”

The delay is a result of a string of cost-saving measures the BPS has made in its effort to tame a $150,000 shortfall.

Last month, Chief Richard Bruce said three officers would be shifted to patrol from other units. He blamed high fuel costs and overtime for the shortfall. Officers would also be asked to double up in cars.

Shortly after, Brandon Police Association president Darren Creighton said officers were told not to drive around as much, and the number of cars on the street at any given time would be cut.

Creighton couldn’t be reached for comment yesterday.

Yanick said city council approved the Taser order and officers were to undergo training this fall. They might have been in use by the end of the year, Yanick said.

Now they’ll train in early 2006 and may be in officers’ hands between January and March.

Yanick explained the officer who would supply the mandatory training has been shifted from the intelligence section to patrol as part of a cost-saving measure aimed at shaving overtime.

“Because he’s been transferred he has other duties and we’re not able to put together the training for the officers at this time of the year,” Yanick said.

Holidays also make it tough to get officers trained by year-end.

“It’s just a bit of a time issue, and a bit of a time crunch,” he said.

About 50 officers, mainly uniformed patrol officers, would carry the devices.

Police value Tasers for their ability to quickly tame suspects.

“It’s a great safety factor for officers,” Yanick said. “It does help to reduce any injuries, not only for the officers but for the subject.”

The Tasers — classified as a prohibited weapon for the general public — would be similar to those used by Blue Hills RCMP. They can be used either as a projectile weapon — with prongs that hook into the target — or by making direct contact with the body. Tasers gained notoriety after six men in the space of about a year — four in British Columbia, two in Ontario — died following zappings.

But investigations into virtually all of those incidents found those who died were high on large amounts of cocaine or crack cocaine and probably went into cardiac arrest from the drug abuse.

Noting that, Blue Hills RCMP Const. Denis Rondeau said RCMP headquarters in Ottawa sent out a message this week to say the stunners are here to stay.

“As far as we’re concerned right now the Tasers are safe and we will continue to use them,” said Rondeau, one of five Blue Hills officers trained to use the devices. “I carry it all the time.”

Rondeau added Blue Hills officers have yet use to the weapon, which costs around $500 each.

Yanick said suspect safety would be a part of BPS training.

It certainly is interesting.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I work in hospital security and our department just started carrying tasers. They work like a charm. I can't imagine working without them, now.
 

Tasers certainly give the police another option. Keep in mind though that lots of people die from being hit by them, and an officer that carries one might be more willing to us it then attempt his diplomacy skills at talking someone out of a situation.

Personally I think they (each and every officer) should have one to carry on duty.
 

I'd love to see something like this in that kind of article:

Brandon Police Association president Darren Creighton commented, "Well this is certainly an inconvenience but not a big setback. Bullets are relatively cheap compared to the cost of the proposed Tasers so we'll just keep shooting folks the old fashioned way until they get this approved under the Police Department's budget. Quite frankly, lethal force incurs less paperwork so no big rush."
 


Crothian said:
Nice, I'd have added that a lethal response has a effect of lowering the rate of repeat offenders.

Not to mention the decreased costs of operating the prison system. ;)
 


Just gotta say this- I have a LOT of friends in law enforcement (state, local, Fed, and military) and a few in weapons systems design...they all tell me the same thing: there is no such thing as a completely safe weapon. There are reports of deaths from rubber bullets, certain restraining holds, and even mace.

So, IMHO, as long as the weapons are less lethal than firearms, I'm OK with law enforcement using them.
 

Brandon Police Association president Darren Creighton commented, "Well this is certainly an inconvenience but not a big setback. D&D Players Handbooks are relatively cheap compared to the cost of the proposed Tasers so we'll just start whacking criminals over the head with a PHB until they get the Taser approved under the Police Department's budget. Quite frankly, I look forward to carrying my gaming stuff out on the streets with me, so no big rush."
Almost any wielded object could cause death or severe injury under the worst circumstances though; including pillows, spoons, goldfish, and even a Players Handbook. :eek:


 
Last edited:

LeapingShark said:
Almost any wielded object could cause death or severe injury under the worst circumstances though; including pillows, spoons, goldfish, and even a Players Handbook. :eek:

Which is what makes "Clue" so ingenious.
 

Remove ads

Top