Dragon Magazine Issue 238: August 1997
part 4/8
Wyrms of the north: Ed is pretty whimsical most of the time anyway. But it seems like his second contribution this month was intended as an april fools one as well. A happy go lucky dragon who constantly crashes into things when flying, and treats evil creatures as a game to be played with, humiliating them, but never taking them seriously or killing them, and has insane amounts of lucky co-incidence insuring things work out for him. Like Master Furli from the gangsters article, I can trace the cartoon antecedents of this character with great ease and pity anyone who encounters him. If he's on your side, it'll be excruciating, and if he's an enemy it will be doubly so. Stuff like this makes Elminster look better by comparison, as at least he knows when he's irritating people, does it on purpose, and has the sense to get sensible when it's needed. The new spells give new uses for teleportation that also have extensive comical applications, particularly Frame Teleport, which makes for serious oh




moments when he extends the duration and poses as a stuffed Dragon head. So this is one of those instances where Ed is simultaneously brilliant and incredibly annoying, and I'm not sure which to give more weight too. I guess your milage will probably vary. Still, he certainly remains interesting.
Frequently asked questions: But not many answers, it seems. They might be assuring us that they're aware of our concerns in light of the takeover, but they're still being very cagey indeed on their decisions. The main thing we can draw from this is that they're definitely going to go where the money is, dropping anything that isn't profitable, and keeping the gamelines that are. Any vanity projects by the old company are




ed. They probably will introduce a new edition at some point, but they would have done that anyway, and they certainly don't want to rush into it and alienate people. This isn't satisfying at all, but at least tells us things are likely to be more sensible from here on out. Whether that's a good thing or not, is very much a matter of opinion.
Bookwyrms: The widowmaker by Mike Resnick showcases another thing that's different about this than the proper reviews. They do a lot more books that are in a continuing series. In this case it's the story of a terminally ill gunslinger and his younger healthier clone that's being used to fund his survival. This allows you to fit plenty of questions about ethics and identity into the action, which sounds like it makes for good sci-fi.
Orion among the stars by Ben Bova sees them pull a bit of nepotism for the magazine's new contributor and recommend his latest book. This time, it's enough with the real world history and into the far future for some epic interstellar war. Once again, I don't really have a complaint about the book, just the fact that this seems rather obvious in light of recent events.
3001: the final odyssey by Arthur C Clarke sees the editing go out of the window as the 1's are replaced with 7's not just once but 3 times. WTF man? More dawizard to your credibility, methinks. Anyway, we finally get a few more answers as to what the hell this was about, presuming you can get through the pacing, which if anything is even more ponderous than the first one. I think we may have to differ in opinions on this one.
Nightlamp by Jack Vance once again takes us to unusual worlds and cultures, and gives us heroes who go against them, at a rather faster pace than Mr Clarke. Again, this seems like such an obvious choice that I'm not sure why they need to recommend it. Actually, looking at wikipedia, it does seem that many of his books have had small runs and gone out of print over the years, so he might not be a rich as we'd expect from an author this big. Hmm. Better safe than sorry, I suppose.
Desperation by Stephen King seems to have a lot of familiar elements too, drawn directly from his own life. Another tale of small town horror against a mysterious supernatural being. Course, he's very good at writing this stuff, so that just means it's a safe buy if you like this stuff.
The regulators by Richard Bachman is one worthy of note, because this is a psudonym of Stephen King, and the two books are strongly linked thematically, showing us the same characters, confronting the same adversary in two rather different parallel realities. That's interesting as both writing and a marketing trick. I approve.
The sandman: book of dreams, edited by by Neil Gaiman & Ed Kramer is a short fiction anthology set in the world of the comics. This proves that the art is not essential to making good stories here, and they manage to be both good and quite varied. Neil isn't bad as a critic either it seems.
Lord of the Isles by David Drake is a little less predictable, as the sci-fi author tries his hand at a fantasy doorstopper. Obviously the writer considers it a success, otherwise it wouldn't be appearing in this column.
Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman is another no-brainer recommendation, especially as they just mentioned another book by him just a moment ago. This just feels like playing it safe to a ridiculous level. Who do they think is reading this? We are quite capable of doing a little follow-up investigation of our own, especially now we have access to the internet.