Level vs. level

I've never been confused. Level of characater. Level of spell. As far as 'level of dungeon' goes, I somehow think that someone being confused by that is a serious stretch. The only confusion that may exist would be with beginners and even that will disappear after playing a few sessions.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Not really a problem, tho it can be a source for confusion, if the context does not make
clear what kind of level is talked about.

In german, spell level is named differently (~ grade).

Bye
Thanee
 

Gez said:
No confusion, but I just think it's a bit clumsy to have to write "spell level" in rulesy stuff when you work on metamagicish things.

Personally, I call spell slots "valences" and each spell level has a name, used in-character by wizards and all sorts of mystics. Name taken from the abaccus stones (called apices, singular apex) of Pope Sylvester II (a.k.a. Gerbert of Aurillac). The original names are sipos (0), igin (1), andras (2), ormis (3), arbas (4), quimas (5), calctis (6), zenis (7), temenias (8) and celentis (9). It seems the names originated from that latin poem:

ordine primigeno sibi nomen possidet igin
andras ecce locum previndicat ipse secundum
ormis post numerus non compositus sibi primus
denique bis binos succedens indicat arbas
significat quinos ficto de nomine quimas
sexta tenet calcis perfecto munere gaudens
zenis enim digne septeno fulget honore
octo beatificos temenias exprimit unus
terque notat trinum celentis nomine rithmum
hinc sequitur sipos est qui rota namque vocatur​

It's unclear where the names themselves come, though some of them sounds semitic or arabic. Anyway, I found them to be perfectly arcane names for numbers -- perfect for naming spell levels in the background of my homebrew. I've twisted them a bit so that they would all end in -is (sepis, igis, andris, ormis, quamis, etc.) to make it look like there was a convention behind the names, and transvalent spells (epic spells, sometimes referred to as tenth-level spells) are simply Is -- raw magical potential.

Wow.

Very cool idea. Consider this yoinked!
 

Never had the problem about the confusion, but got to admit that so many things having the same name is a bit dull.

Gez,

I like your idea so I may just have to steal it (another example of Albion perfide)
 

In the group I am currently with, the DM's wife who was playing a Druid thought that she could cast 6th level spells because her character was 6th level.

So yea, I think it might be a little confusing.
 

Gez said:
It's unclear where the names themselves come, though some of them sounds semitic or arabic. Anyway, I found them to be perfectly arcane names for numbers -- perfect for naming spell levels in the background of my homebrew. I've twisted them a bit so that they would all end in -is (sepis, igis, andris, ormis, quamis, etc.) to make it look like there was a convention behind the names, and transvalent spells (epic spells, sometimes referred to as tenth-level spells) are simply Is -- raw magical potential.

I agree, Gez, that's one of the coolest things I've ever seen. Consider it swiped a second time. :)
 



Remove ads

Top