Rystil Arden
First Post
Continued from Armour for Wizards--
IcyCool said:So, your issue with it lies in the Dex bonus? If a character has a 24 Dex, a feat to blow for Light Armor Op, and money for a Mithril Chain Shirt, then they get full benefit of the Light Armor Op feat (Which is to say, +1 AC (which doesn't apply to touch AC, but does apply to all attacking opponents) over a character with 22 Dex, Dodge, and a MCS).
Rystil Arden said:Mithral Chain Shirt Optimisation
Requirements: Light Armour Proficiency, +1 BAB, Dex 24+
Effects: As long as you wear Mithral Chain Shirt, you gain a +1 increase to both your Armour Bonus to AC and your Dex bonus to AC for a total of +2 AC
Fine, call the second +1 a Dodge bonus.IcyCool said:The effect of that feat is to get you a +1 increase in armor bonus. The additional +1 to your Dex bonus does nothing, as the maximum dex bonus of the Mithral Chain Shirt is still only +6. I understand what you were going for, but you worded it poorly.
Until a character with Light Armor Op (and the silly high dex of 24) has +5 armor, all that is really happening is that he saves on the cost of +1 to his armor, or doesn't need to have the party buffer cast an armor boosting spell.
Rystil Arden said:As to the second part of your post, all I can say is huh? You claim that the feat isn't overpowered because it 'only' saves you money on buying the magic item that does the same thing (even though it stacks with said item). By that logic, a feat that gives you a +2 (unnamed so fully stackable) bonus to Strength is balanced because it saves you the cost of a +2 Belt of Strength or having the party buffer cast Bull's Strength![]()
Not trying to be snippy, so apologies if I came off that way. I'm just seriously confused by the logic you used--not like sarcastically saying I'm confused, honestly confused. I'm just wondering basically what I asked above: are you saying that a feat is balanced so long as it creates an effect that can be attained by a magic item, even if it also stacks with the magic item?IcyCool said:No need to get snippy, I'm not trying to rain on your parade.
The second part of my post was there to illustrate just when a character gets to truly take advantage of the "overpowered" part of the feat. Sorry if that wasn't clear to you.
Rystil Arden said:Not trying to be snippy, so apologies if I came off that way. I'm just seriously confused by the logic you used--not like sarcastically saying I'm confused, honestly confused. I'm just wondering basically what I asked above: are you saying that a feat is balanced so long as it creates an effect that can be attained by a magic item, even if it also stacks with the magic item?