It does indeed, and lacking any subsequent clarification, I'm going to assume that you mean the actual, "textbook" definition of high fantasy, as described
right here.
In my opinion, that rules out settings like Iron Kingdoms and Eberron which, although I love them dearly, I wouldn't consider high fantasy in the traditional sense. It also rules out the Wilderlands, which—despite being called officially
The Wilderlands of High Fantasy—seem to have a very strong Sword & Sorcery vibe, not a high fantasy one.
I'd also throw The Kingdoms of Kalamar into the ring here. Hârn is almost extreme in this regard, and therefore abandons some of the default D&D assumptions, which Kalamar retains. To use an analogy, if deciding that focusing on verisimilitude and "realism" were like getting rid of animal products, Kingdoms of Kalamar would be the vegetarian setting, while Hârn would be the much more strict Vegan setting. Plus, it hasn't been thrown out there yet and it definately should; where are all the Kalamar advocates who usually swarm on these types of threads by now?