SeaJay
Love, Respect, Understanding
Hello 
My first post.
I'm 43 this year, and cut my teeth on the usual suspects; basic, ad&d, and never went near WotC. Never even formed my own ideas about 3.x, I lived off what others said about the game, and they were sort of biased.
A few weeks ago, one of our group decided to use 3.5 to fuel our 'Temple of Elemental Evil' campaign, and I have to say, I am very pleased he did so.
All my misgivings were unfounded. Combat too long, complicated, not d&d? All proven incorrect. We are having a ball.
I've had in depth discussions about 3.5 and also Pathfinder. I love Pathfinder, I've barealy scratched the surface but it looks like a throwback to Greyhawk. It's your standard fantasy fare (apart from the spaceship part) and that's absolutely fine by me.
All I need now, is for the latest errata listing for the core rules, and I also need to know what to purchase for Golarion.
Wish I'd taken a look at 3.5/Pathfinder years ago. Better late then never I say.
Thanks all

My first post.
I'm 43 this year, and cut my teeth on the usual suspects; basic, ad&d, and never went near WotC. Never even formed my own ideas about 3.x, I lived off what others said about the game, and they were sort of biased.
A few weeks ago, one of our group decided to use 3.5 to fuel our 'Temple of Elemental Evil' campaign, and I have to say, I am very pleased he did so.
All my misgivings were unfounded. Combat too long, complicated, not d&d? All proven incorrect. We are having a ball.
I've had in depth discussions about 3.5 and also Pathfinder. I love Pathfinder, I've barealy scratched the surface but it looks like a throwback to Greyhawk. It's your standard fantasy fare (apart from the spaceship part) and that's absolutely fine by me.
All I need now, is for the latest errata listing for the core rules, and I also need to know what to purchase for Golarion.
Wish I'd taken a look at 3.5/Pathfinder years ago. Better late then never I say.
Thanks all
