EverDarkness said:I'm writing a paper on this for my argument class.
Argument Class!? This is Insult Class you festering git, Argument Class is down the hall.

Man, I've never heard of an argument class. I soooooo wish we had that in my school!

EverDarkness said:I'm writing a paper on this for my argument class.
jgbrowning said:each character would gain skill points for the three various realms depending upon class. Every character would have ranks in various knowledges and social skills (bluff, sense motive) that any experienced person should have. These types of skills would increase the role-playing possibilities because they would provide a more structured framework for non-combat conflict resolution.
joe b.
Olive said:but thats what untrained skill checks are for. anyone witha wisdom of intelligence of 10 can still get a 20 on a roll and come up with general knowledge, of basic chances to notice things. it's only people who train in the other things that get the special rolls.
Piratecat said:"Broken"
by Sagiro...
{much inspired poetical madness}
...Fine.
Pass the d20.
I’ll play one more session.
the end
Dark Eternal said:...never seen that before... very impressive...
To me, they didn't want to make the cross-class skills expensive, they want to make the relevant class skills affordable.bret said:
Limitations on who gets Diplomacy or Swim as a class skill is an example of the stereotypes. Why should it be harder for a wizard or cleric to learn to swim than a rogue? I would have put skills like Climb, Swim, Diplomacy and maybe Ride on everyone's skill list. For me, the whole cross-class vs. class skill is a little silly. The cross-class skills rule is the one that usually most interferes with me creating the type of character I want.