[Meta-Troll]

Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad




Tries to re-ignite the thread with convoluted restatement of positions on:

1) The monk ability: Furry of Bose™

2) The Feat: Cow of Poverty

3) Natural Whippins vs. Unharmed Steaks

4) Rules: RAW vs Kooked

5) D&D Farced Edition

6) Paladins ex-cuting someone
 


Hussar said:
Responds with a paladin actually going out of his way to not execute every evil he meets and actually attempt to stay within the idea of good.
Since this is a gamer talking about a character, the description of the paladin goes on for two posts, each constituting eight paragraphs. The posts includes such things as his physical description, upbringing, equipment, and best kills.

And all along, he does not realize that by not slaying everything evil immediately, he is going against the orignal concept of the paladin. At least, that's what the next poster declares following the long-winded and pointless description of the paladin.
 

Dragonbait said:
And all along, he does not realize that by not slaying everything evil immediately, he is going against the orignal concept of the paladin. At least, that's what the next poster declares following the long-winded and pointless description of the paladin.
After the long-winded and pointless description of the paladin, declares that by not slaying everything evil immediately, he is going against the original concept of the paladin.

Also warns Dragonbait never to put words in my mouth again.
 
Last edited:

Responds to the original post with an argument that's been brought up, argued over, broken into countless sub-arguments, and eventually beaten to death over hundreds of posts while casually tossing in an "I didn't read all those posts, because some people don't know how to keep their posts short, but my take on it is..." under the mistaken apprehension that a line like that justifies my behavior.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top