I work too, and I don’t engage with social media much beyond gaming forums like this. But I’m fortunate enough to have very stable employment, and I’d be willing to bet you do too. Jobs don’t necessarily require social media engagement; job markets do. Careers in which one must consistently market one’s self, such as freelance work and most creative work do not generally afford one the luxury of foregoing social media. If I wanted to start doing theater work again, for example, I would need to engage with social media to at least a cursory extent to be able to find auditions, as that’s where they’re advertised these days.
How do job marks depend on social media? Did they not exist before?
Or do you mean we depend on them now?
In either case, engaging in social media is a choice. And how one engages with it is also a choice. Following a couple of theaters is a very responsible use of social media, as is following other businesses that offer freelance work. However, when someone uses the phrase "uses social media," the intended meaning is usually different.
Anyone in those communities write or develop RPGs?
No, but I don't see how its reliant. D&D was designed and played in a time when all communities lacked internet.
If you're talking about professional work, no. I doubt any of them did. Different choices lead to different lifestyles, and each of those choices has consequences.
Now, I think Zak probably didn't have right temperament for fame and his emotions led him astray. He did something wrong. He has faced consequences. I think time to move towards redemption.
Let's imagine someone accuses me of harassment. Whether that accusation is truthful or not, I'm sure I would get emotional and wouldn't make the best choices. Personally, I don't think I should pay for those mistakes for eternity.
That’s your prerogative. Personally, I advice support for folks in need of it and consequences for those who use what influence they have to harm others, especially those with less power than them.
Such reservation tends to benefit those with power at the expense of those without.
Social consequences are often the only consequences people in power face.
I don't understand what you mean by "power." Usually, I equate it with forces of motion and authority. I don't see how either of those is relevant. Maybe you're using a different definition of power.