JohnNephew said:Gen Con should be as big as the Essen fair in Germany, if not larger -- but that physically can't happen in Milwaukee today.
NLP said:Gary,
I think you should define "blows off the city". The move from Milwaukee to Indianapolis was decided some 2 to 3 years ago; long before Pete purchased the rights for Gen Con.
Mistwell said:
Ha! You think Indianapolis could handle that size fair?
Eventually, if GenCon is going to become the best it can become, this convention will have to move to a convetion city, like San Diego, Anaheim, or Las Vegas (all convention cities that I know about, living on the west coast, though I am sure there are convention cities on the east coast as well).
Indianapolis is just a stop-gap measure, in my opinion.
Buttercup said:
Any large city could handle a mega-convention. I've been to professional conventions in Atlanta, Chicago, NYC, Dallas, New Orleans and San Francisco. The problem is that those are some of the most expensive cities to visit. A mid sized city like Indianapolis, Cleveland, St, Louis or Louisville is much cheaper, generally. I mean, it's not like the gaming industry is producing millionaires.
Convenience of location is a concern too. Someone else mentioned direct flights, but having the con located in the middle of the continent, roughly, is probably spreading the inconvenience around evenly. (Well, not for me, but I'm already in the middle of the continent.) If you put it on the east or west coast, it may be out of reach, financially and distance-wise, for many more fans.