Yes, that's what I think. You didn't read the comment or think about it until I'd said some variant of it for the fourth time. Demonstrating that you only argue with what you think I'm saying, not what I'm saying.
Wow. I cannot even comment on someone who thinks that someone else should do their fact checking for them.
I suspect more people do agree with me - they're just not bothering to post in a thread about fire snakes. We pointed you to the massive debate on this very topic on the GitP forum.
Yeah, and many of the ones I read there thought that the baby POV was weak there as well. Now, I'm sure you could go off to that thread and find some posts that support your POV, but that's not the point.
The point is that your argument has little traction here.
No, the bottom line is that when another poster agreed with me about the potential problems of slaying juvenile sentient creatures, you belittled her opinion and dismissed her argument in a very insulting way.
At that point of the conversation, I didn't think people were serious about this. It sounded like a total parody. I guess you didn't see the humor of "Step away from the caffeine" or latrines.
In fact, I'm starting to think that you are not serious about this at all and are just pulling our chains, all as a big joke. Yup. Time for you to get the last laugh on this one.

Since then you've been trying to defend your side as an actual debate point instead of a knee-jerk reaction.
Actually, I've debated quite a bit. It's barbs like this one here which weakens your credibility. You are not discussing the topic here, you are discussing how I debate.