(Mongoose) The Quintessential Druid

Re: Celtic society?

Brudewollen said:
I'm profoundly interested in seeing an at least somewhat realistic treatment of Celtic society for D&D settings (at least as much as we know of them, which is little...). The 2nd Edition Celts book was not bad, but not great. Was there any attempt in this publication to address this? Discussions of the Roman accounts of the Celts and Druids (scary stuff...) and from whatever other sources might be out there? The D&D Druid is often depicted as a much more benevolent force then the Roman historians/chroniclers (Julias Caesar among them) would have their readers believe. Some have said it might have been as much propaganda as anything else, but others believe differently. After reading a few books on the Celts my view of them is of a much darker, more grim people then the common D&D view of Druids.

Actually, Avalanche Press (of all people) have just recently come out with a Celtic Age sourcebook (with no cheesecake cover, shockingly). I was flipping through it at the shop the other day, and it looks like what you're after: heavy on the history and background.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Re: Re: Celtic society?

Actually, Avalanche Press have just recently come out with a Celtic Age sourcebook (with no cheesecake cover, shockingly).

What ???

What happened to their cover artist, was he ill ?

About grim druids, since Mongoose also write Slaine RPG products, I believe they know about this darker vision of them.
 


Let me see. . .

December - Samurai
January - Paladin
February - Psion
March - Barbarian
April - Bard
May - Gnome

We have all the others slotted in and waiting to go, but their actual scheduling may be subject to change.
 


Avalanche Press - Celtic Age

Just picked this one up and skimmed some sections on the train ride home. I must say I like what little I've seen, though I have a quibble or two about some rules for the Celtic Druid they have in there.

It's a very scaled down version of the D&D Druid, I get the feeling that this source book is going for a really low magic world - it's more about atmosphere and about being as close to the real legends and history of Celtic society as possible. They also have a magic system that uses a pool of what amounts to spell points, but they call it "Understanding." Essentially the Druid gets 5 points of Understanding per level and various spells cost various amounts. Also you only have access to certain spells at certain levels like before, but the lists are set up a bit differently (not worth explaining here).

My main problem with the system as written, there seems to be no bonus to your magic pool based on Wisdom (again, I only skimmed the book, but it doesn't seem to be in there...). The incentive to have a high Wisdom as a Druid doesn't seem to be supported by the rules. This is particularly distressing because this pool of energy you are drawing from is called "Understanding!!" Shouldn't that imply that Wisdom affects your Understanding pool? I would propose that Druids should get 1 + WIS Mod Understanding points per level. That way, a Druid with an 18 or 19 WIS gets the same 5 Understanding / level suggested under this system. Presumably, having higher Wisdom means you have greater innate understanding, thus should get more out of your learning as you level up. Raise you WIS to 20 and you get 6 Understanding per level.

I wonder if the rules they set down were actually playtested? I noticed in the very brief credits section they had the authors, layout, art direction, illustrators, etc., but nothing about playtesters. Strange...

Other then this problem, the book seems to have great atmosphere, a lot of info about Celtic culture and using that in game. These were all things I was looking for. Really, the book is 1/2 a tract on Celtic culture, the rest being rules interspersed with more Celtic culture stuff (explanations of classes and gods, etc. really fall into both catagories in this book).

Would like to hear from some others who've looked at this book. What do you think about my suggested rule alteration (assuming I didn't miss something that's in there already).
 


Mongoose_Matt said:
Let me see. . .

December - Samurai
January - Paladin
February - Psion
March - Barbarian
April - Bard
May - Gnome

We have all the others slotted in and waiting to go, but their actual scheduling may be subject to change.

About the Samurai, I was wondering how similar it would be to the one in OA or Rokugan.

From the wording of the license and definition of open content, I've had the impression the Rokugan samurai is OGC, and it's the same as the one in OA except the ancestral daisho requires XP rather than money to be enhanced.
 


TroyXavier said:
Another long wait for the book I want most.:) Oh well, May will be well worth the wait, I'm sure.

Ah, yes, Gnomes. This is a straight-faced book, but I could not stop Alejandro sneaking just one little joke in to the sub-races chapter.

We ask for forgiveness now. . .
 

Remove ads

Top