Monte Cook Games, Thunder Plains, & A Petition

Settings based on particular people, times, cultures, or places are commonplace in RPGs, although they tend to be historical (feudal Japan, Vikings, Wild West, Victorian England) or mythological (Aurthurian legends, Greek mythology, Robin Hood). The other day I stumbled across something I'd managed to completely miss - Monte Cook Games was the subject of a petition from somebody who felt that a particular Native American themed recursion (world) in MCG's game The Strange had some issues. The petition has 250 signatures, and MCG adopted a policy of listening to what folks had to say - both in public, and by contacting various bodies - before responding. I've posted both the petition and the response below.

So, first, the petition.

We, the undersigned, DEMAND immediate removal of "Thunder Plains" and all related content from all Monte Cook Games publications current and future, and request an immediate public apology for harm done, regardless of supposed intent from the creators and companies responsible for publishing of this content.

The Strange RPG is a game about world-hopping into alternate realities called "recursions" that are based on amassed collective imagination. For example, there may be a "recursion" all about children's games, or one that specifically features a "cops & robbers" theme since it is a game played around the world by children of all ages.

There may be another "recursion" about Wonderland, since it is a well-known book/story throughout the world.

There may be some not based in any realities of our own world, but from collective imaginations based in other alien worlds.

However, Bruce R. Cordell and Monte J. Cook thought it appropriate to appropriate Native culture and create this mass amalgamation pan-Indian world as one of their main 5 listed in their core guide named "Thunder Plains". In it, they have turned "Thunderbird" into an antagonistic god-like creature, and have littered the 'recursion' with 'medicine men' wearing leather chaps and overly large headdresses with antlers, stating that Indians 'revere' the buffalo.

On and on with such blatantly racist stereotypical trope after trope, belittling real living human being, demeaning our existence, dehumanizing us, and forcibly placing us in the category of make-believe past and purposefully reinforcing the very same imagery that contributes to the continued genocide and colonization that plagues us today.

They have been made very clearly aware of how harmful this is, with numerous links to articles written by Dr. Adrienne Keene, and multiple studies proving, with numbers, how harmful this is.

Their initial response was simple and completely missed the point.

They stated, from their official accounts at @MonteCookGames and @TheStrangeRPG (quickly followed by mouthpiece @ShannaGermain) that their "intent" was to show that this is from collective imagination and that collective imagination and stereotypes are wrong. This is never stated in their book (that this is stereotypically racist and incorrect) and presented solely by itself.

Even if their intent is as claimed, they are profiting off of continued genocide of our peoples via appropriation and racism.

This is unacceptable. #RacismInGaming is rampant and nearly ubiquitous with nerd culture and gaming culture. While developers like Chris Sims are working to be more inclusive (to LGBTQIA spectrum folks and women especially), it seems Monte J. Cook and Bruce R. Cordell are reveling in purposeful racism.

When confronted with these issues, there have been offers for inclusion on review boards, but no acknowledgement of mistakes or harm, no apologies, and plenty of jibes and rude comments (especially from Shanna Germain). The official twitter of the individuals, game company, and game itself have repeatedly blocked anyone speaking against it, and thereafter began mocking the real harm done and real discussion being had as "outragism" and a non-issue (see attached image from Bruce Cordell twitter).

We cannot let this stand. There is overwhelming and ever-mounting evidence of the real actual harm done to Native peoples by imagery like what is seen in The Strange. There are over 560 federally recognized, hundreds of state recognized, and hundreds that aren't recognized (fighting for recognition, whom imagery like this directly harms) SOVEREIGN Native Nations in the US ALONE.

Step up, and help us deliver a message to the creators (Monte J Cook and Bruce R Cordell) that they CANNOT ignore.


And Monte Cook Games' response.

Last year, Monte Cook Games published an RPG called The Strange that involved otherworldly “recursions” based on the fiction of our own Earth. In August of last year, we heard from someone who had concerns about a small section of the game, a recursion called the Thunder Plains. We attempted to engage with that person to understand the concerns, but by January, the person ultimately became abusive, and communications broke down.

Recently, this same individual created a petition on change.org.

(Link: https://www.change.org/p/monte-cool-games-we-the-undersigne…)

The petition did not get much support. We felt personally blindsided and hurt by the libelous portrayal of our company and our employees within the text, but we knew the impact of the petition on our business would be negligible.

Still, we were worried that there was an issue here we just weren’t seeing. We recognized that as non-Native people and as the creators whose intent might not have been well communicated, we might be blind to a valid concern.

This wasn’t a money or even a PR issue. There wasn’t enough support for the petition to put “pressure” on us, and in fact the majority of people that we heard from, privately and publicly, Native and non-Native, said that we really didn’t need to do anything.

So this was not a business question, but an ethical one.

Some called for an immediate response from us, but at that point, our voices were the least important. We needed to listen, not talk. Change.org does not allow for discussion of any kind, so we made as transparent a post as we could on our Facebook page. Because many people have a problem with Facebook (and in particular its backward policies on Native names) we made a post on our Google+ page at the same time. We included a link to the petition. These posts got a lot of comments.

We appreciated the initial, reasonable conversation and exchange of views, but eventually things got vitriolic, both in the comments of our posts and in particular elsewhere on the Internet. There were lies, name-calling, and harassment, and ultimately people got involved whose only apparent agenda was to rile up anger. But despite all that noise, we heard some well-reasoned and clearly sincere voices too.

And these were voices, we knew, that didn’t often get listened to.

We spoke privately and in person with a variety of Native people about cultural appropriation in gaming and other media, about their hopes for the future of gaming, and in particular about our game. We asked them, “Is Thunder Plains problematic?”

The answer was complicated.

Our major concerns were these:

1. The Thunder Plains material could be easily misunderstood and misconstrued. The people we spoke to made it clear that while charges of racism were overblown, and the respectful intent was clear, Thunder Plains got some facts wrong—alterations that could be seen as slights, not creative license. It fell into the traps of stereotypes and generalities, grouping together peoples, customs, and myths that were not and are not uniform. RPG writers do that all the time, because we have only a few paragraphs to describe what is sometimes an entirely new fictional world. But in this case, that sort of brevity and generalization is the sort of treatment Native people and myth always get in fiction, so to many it just seemed like more of that same problematic treatment.

2. But simply removing Thunder Plains created other problems. When Bruce, the Thunder Plains designer, wrote the material he did so intentionally because Native people were under-represented and as someone who grew up among the Sioux and Lakota, and has Native family members, he wanted to include them and do so with sensitivity and respect. Our intention was one of inclusion. Simply cutting Thunder Plains would mean less of a Native presence in RPGs, and many people we talked to—particularly Native people—did not want to see that happen.

3. We strongly, STRONGLY believe in freedom of expression and abhor censorship of any kind. But if you write something and it turns out it doesn’t convey what you wanted to say, questioning that isn’t censorship. It’s clarity.

Still, we were worried about suggesting that angry harassment is a valid way to enact change. It is not. We strongly reject harassment of any kind and apologize to any of those who have been harassed for speaking up for us. We also apologize to any of our detractors who may have been harassed by those seeking to support us.

We considered taking no action, in no small part because it would present a strong message that harassment campaigns don’t work. But we knew that wouldn't be the right choice. We needed to honor those quiet, respectful voices more than we needed to quell the loud ones.

We have decided to replace the current Thunder Plains material in The Strange with a different Native American themed recursion. We will create this recursion alongside the Native writers with whom we’re already talking. Future printings will contain the new material, and the PDF versions will be altered with a free electronic update. The recursion will also be available to everyone as a free ebook.

There’s a risk here that some people will see this as capitulation—that we’re “giving in” to harassment. Or that the harassers will see ANY Native recursion as offensive, and continue their campaign. But so many Native American gamers asked us to keep a presence on our pages. So rather than delete and back away, we're going to move forward. We're going to learn, and create. We hope our response will encourage more Native designers, writers, and artists—as well as those of other minority groups and cultures—to play RPGs and work on games.

We cannot stress enough that we are doing this because we were moved by the thoughtful voices we heard, willing to engage with us in conversation. Could we have ignored this issue? Yes. Could we have written a lengthy defense of our creation and our intentions that would have satisfied 99% of the people out there? Yes. Could we have spent our time fighting the petition’s libelous language? Yes.

But instead, we thought, why not just listen to that unheard 1% instead? Not the vitriolic nothing-is-ever-good-enough 1%, but the ones who just quietly wish someone would look at things from their point of view once in a while?

This is a small gesture, but at this time, it’s what we can do to say to those people that someone’s listening.

Is this the right answer? We don’t know. But we believe in positive change. Change doesn’t always just mean “change the world.” Sometimes it means “change yourself.” And sometimes it just means “change who gets listened to.”

This doesn’t mean that every time someone has a gripe with our books we’ll make a change. Quite the opposite: We’re taking this action because sincere people connected with us and maintained a civil discussion with reasonable points of view.

Isn’t that, in the end, the way we all wished things worked every time?



I personally don't know enough about Native American culture to comment on the accuracy of the recursion, nor am I ever likely to know what it feels like to have one's culture appropriated. I have met most of the staff of MCG, though, and they're all genuinely nice people; I can't imagine them feeling anything other than distressed at just the thought that they might have hurt somebody, whatever the case may be.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

TheSwartz

Explorer
I really hate how political correctness is infiltrating gaming. Behind their cries of "racism" are attempts at censorship of an art form. Look at the recent brouhaha about scantily clad women in fantasy art for another example.

I'm part Native American. I simply don't understand these people; the aforementioned work is hardly insulting or demeaning. I'm also part Irish. Am I supposed to create petitions to remove leprechauns and Irish bars from our culture because they make the Irish seem childish or drunks? (Which maybe we are.... lol). But, no. That's not how these debates go. Political correctness is a one way street.
 

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
MCG has chosen to openly dismiss the vast majority who have contacted them to say, "It's fine. Leave it alone," and only regard the very few who demanded change. This is literally a small group deciding for everybody else what they can have. And they don't even have the dignity of pretending this is controversial.

How can ANYONE think this is OK?

Their job isn't to democraticize their decision-making process; they're artists, not politicians. It was to decide what they wanted their own stance on the issue to be, adopt that stance, and do what they feel is right and ethical. If you feel differently, that's fine; but that's how they feel, and that's the product they've decided they want to make.
 

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
Am I supposed to create petitions to remove leprechauns and Irish bars from our culture because they make the Irish seem childish or drunks?

You're not "supposed" to, no. You have the right to, though, if it were something you felt strongly about, and if in doing so you raised enough awareness maybe some business owners might decide they agree with you, and others might decide otherwise.
 

Fergurg

Explorer
People can think this is okay because sometimes the minority is in the right. People can think this is okay because sometimes we have to do the right thing even if it is inconvenient. I am sure we are all aware of numerous instances throughout recent years where a small minority has spoken up (and been listened to) on a variety of social issues and change for the better has been the result.

MCG did not listen to the more radical views, but rather sought calmer voices and determined that they were not standing where they wanted to be on this issue. I see nothing wrong with this -- in fact just the opposite.

I suppose the other issue is that in this case, the minority is not in the right. American Indian cultures are not something that should only be spoken of in reverent, hushed tones with not a word of criticism - especially in a game that is ABOUT stories and the collective imagination; I will not give any culture a pass that other cultures don't get.

But this was, literally, MTG saying, "We know that the majority of our customers want this product and support it, but we are instead going to listen to the 1% of the people we heard from who want this product to be unavailable."

(My other concern, a bigger one, is there seems to be a movement to liberalize the RPG community by driving out the non-liberals, but that is a topic for another thread.)
 

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
But this was, literally, MTG saying, "We know that the majority of our customers want this product and support it, but we are instead going to listen to the 1% of the people we heard from who want this product to be unavailable."

That is not what the above statement says.
 

Fergurg

Explorer
I really hate how political correctness is infiltrating gaming. Behind their cries of "racism" are attempts at censorship of an art form. Look at the recent brouhaha about scantily clad women in fantasy art for another example.

I'm part Native American. I simply don't understand these people; the aforementioned work is hardly insulting or demeaning. [snip]

I know this answer: they are a generation who saw Dances with Wolves and thought it was a documentary.
 

Gronin

Explorer
This is not a case of censorship or liberalism running rampant. This is a case of a business listening to a customer complaint (admittedly a complaint that might have been better presented) and then following that complaint up with some research of their own and making a decision regarding how to respond. MCG is under no obligation to listen to the majority on any issue, even if they ask for opinions. They decide what works best for them and then proceed as they wish. No explanation is required. Some will like the decision and some will not, in the end the only "vote" you have that matters when it comes to how a business operates is the vote you make with your wallet. If you don't like a decision don't buy their products.
 

TheSwartz

Explorer
This is a case of a business listening to a customer complaint ... MCG is under no obligation to listen to the majority on any issue ... They decide what works best for them and then proceed as they wish. No explanation is required

I wish that was truly the case.

However, the fact is that in the United States to be labeled a "racist" is akin to being labeled a witch in Salem circa 1692. Hence their strong language in the response ("libelous portrayal", etc.) I don't see that they really have any choice than to defend themselves.

...in the end the only "vote" you have that matters when it comes to how a business operates is the vote you make with your wallet. If you don't like a decision don't buy their products.

I happen to agree with you, because I believe in Freedom. However, the politically correct movement does not. Hence, I believe such strong accusations are nothing less than character assassination; which is precisely the type of tactic the politically correct deploy in order to bully their point of view upon the rest of the world who don't agree with them. (instead of just leaving people be and vote with their wallets as suggested).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
I wish that was truly the case.

However, the fact is that in the United States to be labeled a "racist" is akin to being labeled a witch in Salem circa 1692. Hence their strong language in the response ("libelous portrayal", etc.) I don't see that they really have any choice than to defend themselves.



I happen to agree with you, because I believe in Freedom. However, the politically correct movement does not. Hence, I believe such strong accusations as nothing less than character assassination; which is precisely the types of tactics the politically correct try in order to bully their point of view upon the rest of the world who don't agree with them. (instead of just leaving people be and vote with their wallets as you suggest).

You've made your position clear. Please calm down with the general ranting about things not directly connected to this issue. If you're unhappy with the general political state of your country, please find a more appropriate venue to express it; politics are not permitted on EN World.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Top