Celebrim said:
The next step is rescinding the OGL. I can hear this discussion in the Hasbro board rooms alread, "This D&D thing would be as big as Pokemon if they hadn't given it away."
Not to belabor the point, but Hasbro CAN'T do that. Let's nip the speculation in the bud. Hasbro can no more rescind the OGL than I can. Anything that is OGC is stuck as OGC, under version 1.0a of the OGL, until it falls into the public doman (IOW, it's under the OGL forever since nothing will ever fall into public domain again).
The worst they can do is refuse to approve the remainder of the SRD - but since there are a plethora of OGC spells, monsters, and treasures out there already, they're screwed on that count, too.
Intentional or not, Dancey in his push for the OGL also managed to put the system "out into the public arena" and permanently out of the hands of Hasbro - or any other corporation that purchases the rights to D&D. IMO this is a good thing... play your cards right and YOU could be the company making money off the system. Survival of the fittest - and best games - makes for a better RPG industry, WotC notwithstanding.
BTW, I can't remember the last time I bought a WotC book over a 3rd-party book. WotC has, IMO, already gutted themselves to the point of non-competitiveness... their stuff is dry and rehashed. 3rd party stuff is edgier and pushes the boundaries of the system. It's anecdotal evidence to be sure, but it's evidence to me that WotC has already made the moves that seal its doom as relates to D&D remaining profitable. I can't think that I'm the only one who is seeing his discretionary income going to other companies because "well, I compared the WotC supplement and the Company X supplement on the subject, and frankly, the WotC supplement sucked."
--The Sigil