You're absolutely right. I pretty much figured that out a couple of sessions after the Windwalker entered play.BobROE said:I think it was based on the theory that you'd be a ranger taking it, and if that's true it's not that bad. But from a cleric it's definitely broken.
arnwyn said:I don't buy the "feat and skill" investment argument, and never will. Experience has proven (to me) that it's irrelevant - and in many cases, beneficial.
For me, there is no "seems" - experience with the WW prestige class has already shown me that my personal impressions are correct.
And my experience with an 18th level ranger/cleric/WW is that it is powerful, but most benefits are not that relevant. Also, if you want to be able to have any amount of decent skills or useful feats you really do need to take that Ranger level, otherwise you are paying a lot of cross class, need martial weapon: GS, tracking and lightning reflexes. Without Ranger at mid levels you can't even have ranks in concentration.arnwyn said:I don't buy the "feat and skill" investment argument, and never will. Experience has proven (to me) that it's irrelevant - and in many cases, beneficial.
For me, there is no "seems" - experience with the WW prestige class has already shown me that my personal impressions are correct.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.