Simple. Because I have neither said nor implied that anywhere in my posts.Why is this 'clearly' untrue? By your own arguement you appear to imply that Pathfinder 2e is going to succeed but this is unsubstantiated. I don't take issue with that though as this is your implied viewpoint.
You may have not been paying much attention to other PF2 threads then. This is not the first time this has come up in discussions, and I have addressed those points elsewhere.The 'narratives' that people put forward for why PF2e may or may not succeed are also part of their opinions. You might not like them, in which case you should put forward a counter arguement as to why those opinions are incorrect. You can't just keep saying 'I take issue with those opinions' because they rub you up the wrong way.