JacktheRabbit
Explorer
Ok, here is the situation.
Cannister of alchemist fire gets dropped on ground and burst into flames.
Cleric immediatly casts create water and drops 4 gallons of water on fire. My thinking was it would smother the fire of oxygen and kill it instantly. DM rules that the water only causes the alchemist fire to spread since burning oil is not put out by water.
Fine. I do the next best thing. I cast Purify Food and Water on the water I just created. This should then remove all the alchemist fire from the water and make it drinkable. The DM rules that water and oil do not mix so the Purify Food and Water does nothing at all to the burning water oil mess.
So who was right? Was he being fair or was he being obscene in avoiding my solutions so that his plot device of burning down the building will happen?
I can live with either but I want to know now if this is the first hint that my DM's plot devices are more important than innovative players.
Cannister of alchemist fire gets dropped on ground and burst into flames.
Cleric immediatly casts create water and drops 4 gallons of water on fire. My thinking was it would smother the fire of oxygen and kill it instantly. DM rules that the water only causes the alchemist fire to spread since burning oil is not put out by water.
Fine. I do the next best thing. I cast Purify Food and Water on the water I just created. This should then remove all the alchemist fire from the water and make it drinkable. The DM rules that water and oil do not mix so the Purify Food and Water does nothing at all to the burning water oil mess.
So who was right? Was he being fair or was he being obscene in avoiding my solutions so that his plot device of burning down the building will happen?
I can live with either but I want to know now if this is the first hint that my DM's plot devices are more important than innovative players.