Neopets Says TTRPG Playtest Was Released Without Their Approval

Neopets has requested the playtest document be pulled down from public use.
1771612028668.png

Neopets has released a statement about an upcoming TTRPG adaptation after licensee Geekify released a controversial playtest document. In the statement, Neopets claims that the beta playtest document released by Geekify earlier this month was released without their approval and that they've requested that the document be taken down. "Following an internal review, Neopets has determined that the content and themes contained within the document do not align with our brand standards, values, or the expectations we hold for experiences created under the Neopets license," the statement read. The statement goes on to say that the Neopets TTRPG will be limited to existing lore only except for when explicitly approved by Neopets and that the TTRPG will be more than combat focused. "We are also insisting that the game capture the full breadth of the Neopets experience: not just combat, but the exploration, magic, community, creativity, and the whimsical storytelling that makes Neopia so beloved," the statement reads. "And while Neopets has always included moments of higher stakes and darker themes, those elements must be handled thoughtfully and appropriately with sensitivity and inclusivity at the forefront."

Geekify raised over $425,000 via Kickstarter to produce a Neopets RPG back in 2024. Geekify's initial playtest document revealed a combat-focused 5E-derived game with a playtest adventure that involved torturing a group of drunk bandits. Fans also took umbrage towards sections involving player discussions about sexual content. Given that the Neopets IP is based more on family-friendly and whimsical activities, it seemed like a tonally discordant adventure compared to the original online game. Even more concerning than the content were references that Geekify had not paid writers for the content in the playtest, although Geekify disputed these comments and claimed it was an internal misunderstanding.

While Neopets seem to be heavily critical of the Neopets TTRPG, they appear to be confident that the game will still be made. "We believe there is a fantastic Neopets TTRPG waiting to be made, one that captures the magic of exploring Neopia, that gives you the freedom to adventure across all the lands you know and love, while honoring the unique qualities of the Neopets world," the statement ends by saying. "We are focused on taking the time needed to ensure the project reaches that potential."
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer


log in or register to remove this ad

Since when is that an expectation of a Kickstarter?
Cause when I read this: https://help.kickstarter.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005048173-Does-Kickstarter-issue-refunds
"Kickstarter is not a store and we do not issue refunds. When you back a project, you’re supporting a creator’s right to try to make something new—and agreeing to go along for the ride"

So yea, don't expect a refund from anyone if this fails.
Exactly why I held off backing Two Little Mice's Twilight Sword.
 

Geekify's initial playtest document revealed a combat-focused 5E-derived game with a playtest adventure that involved​
torturing a group of drunk bandits​
. Fans also took umbrage towards sections involving​
player discussions about sexual content.​
Given that the Neopets IP is based more on family-friendly and whimsical activities, it seemed like a tonally discordant adventure compared to the original online game.​

Having read just the info linked here, I'm having trouble finding good reasons for the outrage.

The "torture" is a "DC 4 intimidation check or persuasion check". That's not torture unless your players want it to be torture.

What's being called "homophobia" is a scripted line where a NPC says "He wouldn't be caught dead wearing a bracelet that was so ... feminine". Maybe not the most inclusive line ever, but also stretch to call homophobic. Actually, sometimes an understandable opinion for someone who is struggling with gender identity. Could be a good angle on that character; maybe they're transmasc?

The sexual content is "there's a section about discussing with your group how much in-game sex they're comfortable with". Yeah, that's how session 0 works.

Maybe this needs some editing to make this more on brand with Neopets, but that's what prerelease material is for. Maybe there's more offensive chunks I'm missing. But this feels like a nothingburger right now.
 

Since when is that an expectation of a Kickstarter?
If the creator doesn't deliver, they need to do their best to make it right (Kickstarter Terms of Use, section 4), which has various things that the creator could try, including refunds.

Cause when I read this: https://help.kickstarter.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005048173-Does-Kickstarter-issue-refunds
"Kickstarter is not a store and we do not issue refunds. When you back a project, you’re supporting a creator’s right to try to make something new—and agreeing to go along for the ride"
Definitely, KS transfers the funds to the creators. But creators who don't deliver are asked for refunds all the time, and sometimes it goes to court.

 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top