Once more, with feeling. The 'universal fact' I have been addressing specifically with the other poster, is that it is, in their eyes, a 'universal fact' that the feat is broken and needs to be changed.
It feels like you're just clinging to alternative facts at this point.
Honestly, I would no longer be surprised if I presented you with two identical feats, one strictly twice as good as the other, and you would still claim the game is all good, there are no problems, and besides, people can just house-rule if there's things they don't like.
You have been presented with overwhelming analysis the feat provides unparalleled damage when utilized correctly. That some martial builds are simply excluded. That monsters can't keep up.
Not acknowledging the feat is a singular source of disruption and wholly bad for the game is impossible if you stick with the facts.
But you choose to not respond to any poster making an argument you don't care to meet, probably because you have no case.
When your own bad-faith and illogical arguments are called out, you don't respond or even acknowledge them.
At every turn, you try to twist the discussion into becoming about person rather than fact. You several times take umbrage at what people say, apparently hoping they will be mired in personal back and forth where you know you can't lose.
Also, I have personally yet to see a single example where you post on another agenda (such as actually playing the game, or finding something in the rules you want to improve) than defending the PHB, never backing down a single inch.
At this point: what reason would you say there is for me to not dismiss your views as a complete apologist, Corwin?
Sent from my C6603 using
EN World mobile app