barsoomcore
Unattainable Ideal
Gonna take down two birds on one stone here...
Rights always belong to somebody, even if it's everybody. Since the rights weren't public domain (else they'd still be public domain) SOMEBODY owned them, and that somebody (if it wasn't TSR) had to have originally purchased them from TSR.Ranger REG said:AFAIK, no one owned the film right since TSR sold it out in the option market. Solomon picked it up like you pick up a carton of eggs at Safeway.
Well, me too, but oh well. At least it wasn't Michael Bay.Ranger REG said:And if you don't mind, I'd have preferred a devoted but also SKILLED filmmaking fan.
No argument from me here. I LIKE the film, but it's definitely a BAD film.Bass Puppet said:Regardless if he owns the rights to the D&D trademark, he made a bad film.
Why do you care what his motives are? You can make up any answer you like to those questions. And why do you put "owns" in quotes? It's not a matter open for debate. Or, rather it is, since I don't actually KNOW that he owns the rights, but SOMEBODY does, and whoever does has every right to do whatever the heck they want to do with them. You can complain about what they do, you can say they aren't talented, but saying they don't have the right to do so is simply untrue.Bass Puppet said:Yeah, good for him, he's taken on this project. But to what expense? To make the D&D core happy (we know that answer to that)? To line his pockets full of money (you think he's sitting back smiling, but who really knows how he feels)? To get more "experience" in the film industry? Because he "Owns" the rights? Because he purchased the rights before anybody else thought of taking on the project?