Irda Ranger said:Then they should just call it Transmutation. "Serpent's Eye" tells me nothing. It's verbiage. It's useless. It's a big frickin' impediment to understanding and rules mastery.
Transmute, Illusion, Necro-, ... these words actually mean something. They have roots in the Latin / English speaking traditions. They help me understand what a spell is supposed to do; how it's supposed to work.
The problem however is 1) First glances mean little and 2) We just don't have enough information here.Kunimatyu said:Perhaps, but it sure sounds like an organization name at first glance, doesn't it?
And this, my friends, is why the Tome should remain as an implement.gothmaugCC said:I stand corrected. I bow to your superior knowledge.
*races home to check his copy*
captaincursor said:Anyone else notice that there is nary a mention of necromancy or summoning in either version of the article?
Hmmmm...Charwoman Gene said:War-lock!
Snapdragyn said:I really wish people could get past the idea that names = organization. That is an assumption, & IMO a poor one. We don't expect Transmutation organizations in 3.xe just because Transmutation exists as a school of magic; I likewise see no reason to expect Serpent's Eye as an organization (as opposed to named tradition) in 4e.
JVisgaitis said:This is super way off topic, but Peter B who did the cover for Psionics Unbound? Looks very cool.
Mouseferatu said:In that respect (and I think someone else may have suggested this), the Iron Sigil then becomes the wizardly equivalent of a god,
Eric Anondson said:I'd rather Serpent's Eye IS an organization than the name of category of the spells.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.