New Game of Death: Battle Royale of the GAWDS
- Thread starter clockworkjoe
- Start date
- Status
Number47
First Post
Well, he is very tricky and has a boatload of hit points. Don't forget, max hit points. Without even trying, I could make a 15th level barbarian with a +5 con modifier that would give me 255 hit points without even raging. So, I'm with you that I'm disappointed in Zalilad being alive, but I'm not surprised by it. Looking on the other hand, the guy hasn't even attacked me yet and look at the state he's in. I think the wounding that he's had to counteract every round has slowed him down. We'll see what surprises he can pull out this time.
Hammerhead
Explorer
Seeing as how I read the GoD everyday, and am a neutral party, more or less (I root for Maturak and Dabbil), why don't we start placing bets on who will be the first to die (other than Ancryx, he's already dead). Hawkeye's held, and will be CDG'd in a short while, and Dabbil is administering the beating of his life to poor ol' Zaliad.
Azure Trance
First Post
Hammerhead said:
What currency could we use though, as gambling ain't no fun 'less we have something to gain (or lose) ;D
The ruling seems good to me, taking the following into consideration: 1) you get two checks for that DC 20, increasing your odds by quite a bit; 2) DC 20 isn't that bad at 15th level, there's plenty of room for some skill points in listen and spot--something an adventurer *would* have. Neglecting to bring those skills up is like neglecting to make sure your saves are decent; 3) If a character starts throwing trees all over the place, I'm sure the gods will find it boring and...persuade the character into believing it's not such a great idea. They're sorta there as a metagame device to keep the fight interesting and not turn into a cheese fest.
Reaper: It's not disagreeing with the DM's rulings, or even bringing up discussion on anything he does. Heck, I agree his first ruling for the tree was bad. It's accusing the DM of foul play, and making it a motif in your arguments, that gets me going. It spoils the game more than any (reasonable) bad calls could ever hope to do; I "call you on it" because it is affecting the game negatively. Anyway that's my only beef, state that a decision is bad and not that the DM is bad. I'd much rather we both forget about the whole thing, agreed?
Fingolfin might score a kill this round, but it depends on a few things (aside from a little luck). I can't say who it might be though, because that'd spoil all the fun
Reaper: It's not disagreeing with the DM's rulings, or even bringing up discussion on anything he does. Heck, I agree his first ruling for the tree was bad. It's accusing the DM of foul play, and making it a motif in your arguments, that gets me going. It spoils the game more than any (reasonable) bad calls could ever hope to do; I "call you on it" because it is affecting the game negatively. Anyway that's my only beef, state that a decision is bad and not that the DM is bad. I'd much rather we both forget about the whole thing, agreed?
Fingolfin might score a kill this round, but it depends on a few things (aside from a little luck). I can't say who it might be though, because that'd spoil all the fun
Bhaal said:Fingolfin might score a kill this round, but it depends on a few things (aside from a little luck). I can't say who it might be though, because that'd spoil all the fun
i have this strange itching sensation in the back of my skull... almost as if i were being watched...
...through a sight...
Last edited:
reapersaurus
Explorer
I just wondered :
How does Delaying your action until after someone else's action work in this Game, since initiative doesn't change?
How does Delaying your action until after someone else's action work in this Game, since initiative doesn't change?
- Status
