lurkinglidda
First Post
yup!Vigilance said:Actually, it speaks volumes.
It tells us, at a minimum:
Wizards still has a commitment to open gaming.
yup!The talk of a GSL was genuine, not an attempt to "embrace, extend and exterminate".
yup!Vigilance said:Actually, it speaks volumes.
It tells us, at a minimum:
Wizards still has a commitment to open gaming.
yup!The talk of a GSL was genuine, not an attempt to "embrace, extend and exterminate".
jaerdaph said:It's amazing how many gamers around here were (once again) so WRONG about WotC/Hasbro's motivations and reasons for the delay. :\
Mouseferatu said:And how few of them will step up and admit to it.
It does mean that you can not produce the same product in different versions.amethal said:The GSL and the OGL are mutually exclusive.
I get that you can't use both in the same book.
However, does anyone know if that also means you can't produce the same product in different versions - one under the GSL and one under the OGL?
Mouseferatu said:And how few of them will step up and admit to it.
Psion said:Seriously, how many people were suggesting malice in the first place?
I imagine that anyone who has ever worked at a job in which there is legal wrangling or management shifts in direction understand how projects can get delayed.