Doug McCrae
Legend
This shows that warlords are good, but leaders are evil.Twiggly the Gnome said:Travis Morgan would disagree.![]()

This shows that warlords are good, but leaders are evil.Twiggly the Gnome said:Travis Morgan would disagree.![]()
Felon said:And fourth, "marshal" did the job pretty well. Nice and neutral, a marshal's station can be humble or high.
drothgery said:Does anyone else think they ended up with 'warlord' mostly because they didn't want to call it 'noble', which is the usual name for a class with the role the warlord seems to be heading for?
(still thinks the 4e core classes should be cleric, fighter, mage, noble, ranger, and rogue, with paladin as a PrC)
Henry said:I would have said to ask Monte Cook for permission to call it "Warmain." That name works even better for me.![]()
Gez said:Well, I don't know. Depends on exact abilities of the class.
I'm going to throw in a "me too" for this.Felon said:What a terrible name. First off, warlord has pretty heavy negative connotations. It's a bully, a thug who rules by force. Second, a warlord leads an army, not a small group of skirmishers. Third, it's a grandiose title, inappropriate for low-level characters.
Yes. But only 30% of the replies are in favor of the Warlord. The remainder 70% are opposed to it. They just can't decide on the alternative.Wormwood said:As of this posting, Warlord is the single most popular name (even beating out 'something else').