TracerBullet42
First Post
I was going to say the exact same thing...neuronphaser said:Not to threadjack, but IMHO, Red Hand of Doom is sweet!
/end threadjack
I was going to say the exact same thing...neuronphaser said:Not to threadjack, but IMHO, Red Hand of Doom is sweet!
/end threadjack
amethal said:I'll be buying it.
It just might be the last new D&D book I ever buy, but time will tell.
amaril said:It does include errata.
Yeah, I think I read somewhere that it's 1 rule per page, which can be a lot for approximately 150-something pages of actual rules content. Also, if you take out the examples that overstuffs most books, it seems fairly feasible.Scribble said:it's 160 pages... Yet it contains ALL of the 3.5 rules... plus commentary?
Huh?
Seems small to me.
But maybe not, since I guess it won't have feats or spells or PRCs?
EyeontheMountain said:I know it does, but I do not want simple changes to a few problematic rules, I want them to really go through it and work out a lot of the problems with 3.5 I suppose I should say I basically want it to be a 3.75, but I seriously doubt it will be that extensive, which means I will leave it on the shelf.
amaril said:I'm still debating over Monster Manual V and Complete Champion.