This, and yeah, I thought so too.Tonguez said:Stay with 3.275-mark II being a heavily houseruled mutant offspring of 3e
however I will mercilessly pillage 4e until only the lingering scent of its demise remains
and doesn't everyone do skill challenges anyway![]()
Edgewood said:Whatever your stance on these updates are, one must agree that 3e was a needed change from 2e. 4e is just a cash grab.
Ahglock said:I do not find any more of a needed change in 2e that is not in 3e.
I'm with Tetsubo. 4e is not targeted towards me. Pathfinder definitely is and that is the direction I'll likely take my main campaign world. I've already begun to think about how Kulan will change as a Pathfinder world. The Pathfinder deities might replace the core D&D deites, but I haven't decided yet.Tetsubo said:I'd sticking to 3.5. Though I will eventually pick up Pathfinder's 3.75.
Everything I have seen about 4E has shown me that I am not the games target market.
Edgewood said:3.5 will remain my system of choice for the time being. I'll probably mine the valuable nuggets in the alpha releases of Pathfinder and assimilate them into my campaign until it's final release next year. 4e holds no appeal for me. I do agree that there are more people digging in their heals over the change from 3e to 4e as opposed to 2e to 3e. The release of 4e has a different motive. Whatever your stance on these updates are, one must agree that 3e was a needed change from 2e. 4e is just a cash grab.
Edgewood said:So you stuck with 2e and didn't switch to 3e?