Now this is green energy


log in or register to remove this ad

Another added benefit is that green roofs reduce the heat island effect, meaning less energy is needed to cool buildings/houses.
The overall costs of green roofs pretty much make them a luxury/vanity project right now, unless you're looking at some kind of water filtration use (in which case you're probably still better off going with mechanical system). White roofs are considerably more efficient at reducing heat, specifically. Green roofs do have a nice multi-functional capacity (heat reduction, water filtration and absorbtion, pollution reduction, aesthetic considerations) but right now the added cost of construction, installation, and maintenance isn't offset sufficiently. :/

Doesn't mean I might not put one on the next playhouse I build, though. ;)

Edit: There are times when the cost is worthwhile: New York City's stormwater system has a fabulously tiny margin (1/10th of an inch of rainfall, apparently) before it overloads and starts dumping sewage into the river. So NYC is very interested in anything that reduces runoff.
 
Last edited:

I know that ny,ny and other large cities are recognizing rooftop garden - have been for a decade at least.
 

I know that ny,ny and other large cities are recognizing rooftop garden - have been for a decade at least.
Yeah, our department head always does his studios in NYC, and roof-top gardens and/or other means of controlling runoff from a site are major factors. NYC wants more green, but they also have serious water runoff issues (as I said above) that are the real driver. Anything that traps water and keeps it out of the stormwater system is desirable.
 

roof top gardens create oxygen, reduce runoff, if food gardens, then food too. three way win, unless you are
a mobster, then a 4th win with a way to make a body disappear
.

so is that why there are water towers, to trap water run off?
 

so is that why there are water towers, to trap water run off?
You mean water storage tanks on tops of buildings? Those are usually to provide pressurized gravity-fed water to a building, which is nice when the power goes out and particularly in case of a fire. They're typically refilled by pumps from city water. There's not enough regular and sustained rainfall to use it as a reliable water source for drinking water, I think. You can catch rainwater and direct it into a grey-water system to supplement city water for flushing toilets & etc; I think that's what most people talk about now. Whether or not it actually gets done is another question.

A blue-roof system is another option; you could just capture the rainwater and allow it to evaporate, or do a controlled release so the system isn't overwhelmed.

The storm drains and sewer systems in NYC are interconnected, so storm water goes to the sewer treatment plant. In a rain event, the treatment plants can't handle the additional volume, and it gets shunted straight out into the river. It's an old design; not desirable for obvious reasons.

"A significant blue roof pilot project intended to evaluate the potential of the systems for mitigating combined sewer overflow impacts was conducted between 2010 and 2012 by the New York City Department of Environmental Protection. The NYCDEP blue-roof projects are the first to utilize a novel passive blue roof tray design developed by Geosyntec Consultants which relies on the lateral transitivity of non-woven filter fabric for drawdown control in a full scale pilot. Monitoring of these systems has demonstrated their performance as an effective means for mitigation peak flows and alteration of timing in combined sewer systems." (Blue roofs, Wikipedia)
 

Ah, got it, nice and handy to have I bet. gray water is a good idea, if you can be sure no one drinks from the stool.
 




Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top