No it doesn't. It says that "By Using the Open Game Content You indicate Your acceptance of the terms of this License."Okay, I think we're getting down to the crux of the issue, here. Section 3 states that you accept the terms of the OGL (which sounds like acceptance of an offer) if you use Open Game Content.
The phrase "the Open Gaming Content" (emphasis added) fairly clearly refers to the content that the offeror has designated, in their offer, as OGC.
If the licence terminates then the licensee forfeits the legal powers and permissions they enjoyed under the licence. This includes the permission to use the licensor's copyrighted work. So the licensee might find themself infringing the licensor's copyright. I wouldn't describe that as "essentially nothing unto itself". That's what private law instruments do - they establish and define the legal relationships between those who are party to them.So, presuming I'm understanding you correctly, a breach of the OGL essentially does nothing unto itself, but rather opens the breaching party up to possible litigation...not from the owner of the OGL (i.e. Hasbro), but from other entities whose Open Game Content is used in the breaching product (provided it's not corrected within thirty days)? Given that, what's the practical aspect of "termination" of the License for a breaching party?