OK... that's just vulgar...

Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad


Upon taking a closer look and squinting and stuff, I see the disembodied screaming skulls.

If you ever find that in a vagina...RUN!
 


I didn't see it at all, even when it was pointed out. Then it kicked in after much staring and wondering why I am missing it.

It is like the contraversy in which one scene in The Lion King, people claimed to see a dust cloud form the word SEX, which outraged many parents. Despite knowing where the supposedly offense scene was and looking for it over and over - it is just a dust cloud.... to me.

The power of suggestion....

Edit: Changed reference to avoid religion imagery in coffee stains which might cross forum rules.
 
Last edited:


Heckler said:
Upon taking a closer look and squinting and stuff, I see the disembodied screaming skulls.

If you ever find that in a vagina...RUN!


Gives new meaning to the phrase "enter at your own risk".
 

I would hate to try and explain Georgia O'Keefe's paintings to some of you people.

Oh, and none of you who can't see it should ever be art director's for a book. That picture wouldn't see the light of day in a newspaper because of its suggestiveness.
 


DandD said:
Let's say it. It's a VAGINA.

No, there's no sheath or scabbard in that picture. That's clearly a ferrum or gladius (I'd go with the former, since the gladius can have a more specific connotation as a sword of particular dimensions which bears little to no resemblance to the sword in this picture.)

--Just got home from Latin class Spikey
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top