Lonely Tylenol
First Post
Glad to see that baseless hysteria and imagined threats to public morality still have power over publishers. Go team!Scott_Rouse said:Jesus H Christ!![]()
Guess what I get to go and ask to be fixed tomorrow?![]()
Glad to see that baseless hysteria and imagined threats to public morality still have power over publishers. Go team!Scott_Rouse said:Jesus H Christ!![]()
Guess what I get to go and ask to be fixed tomorrow?![]()
kiznit said:There's a cursed sword in your va-jay-jay.
Dr. Awkward said:Being a bonafide internet perv myself, I really ought to have no problem seeing the sailboat here. But it's just a boring old sword floating in a red glow that if I really try hard I can make look kind of sort of maybe a bit like a sailboat.
Perhaps the Women in Gaming thread has oversensitized some people's sensibilities.
No, no... They see that in the burnt toast down in Mexico.Scott_Rouse said:Jesus H Christ!![]()
Well, let's think about that for a second. You told her it was controversial. There's obviously no dead babies or commie slogans on it, so it must be something hidden in it, and so it's probably sexual, because sexual is easy to convey with little detail. Either it's something small and detailed or it's something suggested in the larger picture. The latter is easy to check for. Just shift your focus like so, and look for penises, boobs, etc. Eureka.Mouseferatu said:For what it's worth, Doc, I just had my wife come take a look. She's a gamer, but she doesn't follow any Internet sites. I didn't tell her what people were seeing in the pic, just that some people felt it was controversial.
She saw it immediately.
So no, it's not just people being overly sensitive.
Dr. Awkward said:So basically, you told her to look for the thing you wanted her to see, and with your prompting, she saw it.
Try as I might, I don't see religious figures, dead babies (well, maybe) or communists in the picture, but man oh man do I see a great big blossoming hoo-hah exploding forth with the delicate colors of a million orgasmic suns, ready to give birth like a ripe peach.Dr. Awkward said:Well, let's think about that for a second. You told her it was controversial. There's obviously no dead babies or commie slogans on it, so it must be something hidden in it, and so it's probably sexual, because sexual is easy to convey with little detail. Either it's something small and detailed or it's something suggested in the larger picture. The latter is easy to check for. Just shift your focus like so, and look for penises, boobs, etc. Eureka.
So basically, you told her to look for the thing you wanted her to see, and with your prompting, she saw it. And so did all the other people in this thread who came here, were directed to go look for something "vulgar" in the picture, and found it. People see religious figures in pancakes too. It's not because they're there. It's because they're looking for them.
Again, I think it's worth pointing out that the probable reason so many people are seeing it, and reporting it in this thread, is because they were directed to look for something "vulgar" in the picture, and were given progressively more detailed hints over the course of the thread concerning what they were supposed to be "finding" in it.Henry said:He might, but the fact that so many people do makes it irrelevant whether he sees it or not.![]()