OK... that's just vulgar...

Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad

Dr. Awkward said:
Again, I think it's worth pointing out that the probable reason so many people are seeing it, and reporting it in this thread, is because they were directed to look for something "vulgar" in the picture, and were given progressively more detailed hints over the course of the thread concerning what they were supposed to be "finding" in it.
Having opened the thread, then opened the picture from the link in the OP, I saw it straight away. I didn't have to squint or anything - it's there in a pretty big way!
 


I think it's a pretty cool bit of imagery myself. Hearkens back to the heyday of Heavy Metal magazine.
 

While Scott asks the art department to adjust the "naughty bits" version of the art, I would ask that folks here keep the thread at a Grandma-standard-crudity-level. We're doing pretty good so far, but a few comments are pushing the boundaries... and I'm finding this funny enough that I'd rather not Klunk the thread. :)
 

I was wondering when a mod was going to weigh in. I've been biting my lip all this time trying to avoid a pun on "critical hit" having to do with that little red eye...
 


Took me about ten minutes of staring at the full-sized image to see it, post-thread. The shrunk version on the actual Ecology article suffers from a weird case of aspect ratio where the dimensions make it look a lot more like girlie bits once you know what to look for.
 

I'm with the "Huh?" brigade on this. Even with all the pointing and shouting about the glow, I can't see a female form.

Sure, the eye in the middle could be construed as a part of the female anatomy, but I'd have gone straight over it as just another wibbly sword with eye motif if I hadn't been looking for vulgarity...
 

I see it, but that's after knowing something was there and the first thought was the Soul Calibur sword. My second thought - a split second later - was "Oh. That's what they are seeing."
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top