Olgar Shiverstone
Legend
Let's hope Andy can un-confuse us. Good catch, pech21.
Like others have said here, this just seems like a bad idea. But then it struck me: what if this is a typo? If I understand correctly, this "rumor" came from figuring the stats of a Dungeon adventure NPC. What if the stats include the Spell Focus feat, but missed the Greater Spell Focus feat? Maybe the GSF feat was added after the initial stat write up and the editor missed the update?Spell Focus and Greater Spell Focus each provide +1 to save DCs (instead of +2). [Du]
Quasqueton said:Like others have said here, this just seems like a bad idea. But then it struck me: what if this is a typo? If I understand correctly, this "rumor" came from figuring the stats of a Dungeon adventure NPC. What if the stats include the Spell Focus feat, but missed the Greater Spell Focus feat? Maybe the GSF feat was added after the initial stat write up and the editor missed the update?
Quasqueton said:Like others have said here, this just seems like a bad idea. But then it struck me: what if this is a typo? If I understand correctly, this "rumor" came from figuring the stats of a Dungeon adventure NPC. What if the stats include the Spell Focus feat, but missed the Greater Spell Focus feat? Maybe the GSF feat was added after the initial stat write up and the editor missed the update?
Quasqueton
So that's basically identical to the current rules?Jaws said:Dragon 309
Paragons of War, The Ecology of the Hobgoblin
While reading this article I came across this little tidbit.
The last paragraph on page 57 states:
Hit the Dirt: If hobgoblin archers are giving you a hard time, try kneeling or even lying prone. Such positioning imposes a -2 or -4 penalty, respectively, on ranged attacks against you.
Felon said:We've had rules for kneeling? Since when? Does it take a move-equivalent action to stand up from, just like being prone?
Hmm. Seems odd that crouching gives a -2 penalty to the attacker, while a one-step size decrease only nets a -1, eh?