TSR On the Relative Merits of the TSR Editions

[Whizbang Dustyboots]

It’s definitely not as intimidating as 1e. I even think the DMG is a valuable resource. Plus the spell books and item books.

The Monstrous Manual was also a very solid book, although the art quality varies wildly.

 

[Micah Sweet]

When you add in all the extra bits, it can significantly increase the time it takes to create a new PC, but the good thing about 2e is that you don't need to have things like proficiencies or class kits, though I'd still grant the fighter specialisation even if I wasn't using weapon proficiencies.

I've never understood the problem with taking more time to make a character. That's a big part of what session zero is for, after all. Take all the time you need I say.

 

[rabindranath72]

I’ve been revisiting 2e for a couple months now. Not running it but just reading the core rules and ya know I think it just might be my favorite edition. It streamlined some warts in 1e and fixed the Thief. My only grumble is Priest class. I have Legends & Lore now and Complete Priest and it works a lot better than I remember though I recall the FR priests being insane compared to L&L. Oh and Psionics. Give me alternate rules for some of those monsters.

It’s definitely not as intimidating as 1e. I even think the DMG is a valuable resource. Plus the spell books and item books.

The early 2e FR resource (FR Adventures hardback by Jeff Grubb and Ed Greenwood) has specialty priests which are not completely busted like the later offerings.

You may also want to look at Rich Baker's Spells and Magic; he re-organises the Spheres and Schools so that Druids and Clerics get more specialised spell lists (like in 1e), and creates the Universal school with essential spells that all wizard specialists can use (e.g. Enchant Magic Item would be needed by all wizard types, but in PHB some specialists could not create magic items.) This is probably the only book I would absolutely use beyond PHB, DMG, and MM.