Oots #468

Elephant said:
You're asking the wrong question.

And you, good sir, are re-kindling an alignment debate that the rest of us abandoned. :)

I'll continue in a different thread, if you'd like to discuss.

Cheers, -- N
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Elephant said:
You're asking the wrong question.

What Good acts has Belkar done lately? Ooh, he saved Hinjo - reluctantly, so his MoJ could be removed. Nope, that doesn't reek of altruism.

Besides, a single Good act does not jump you from Evil to Good. It doesn't even push from from Evil to Neutral.

Yea, he just spent ages slaughtering an uncounted mass of intelligent beings for fun.

Do you really think he was slaughtering hobgoblins for the good of the city? I propose he was doing it because he like stabbing people.

Still way evil and I don't see that changing anytime soon.
 

Nifft said:
And you, good sir, are re-kindling an alignment debate that the rest of us abandoned. :)

I'll continue in a different thread, if you'd like to discuss.

Cheers, -- N

Not really, no. If you wish to point a finger of blame for an alignment debate, look in the mirror while you do so.

I seriously don't understand why so many people try so hard to be apologists for Belkar. He's unabashedly Evil, and he's arguably funnier in many respects than most of the rest of the OOTS.

Why is that so hard for people to accept, I wonder?
 

Elephant said:
Not really, no. If you wish to point a finger of blame for an alignment debate, look in the mirror while you do so.

I seriously don't understand why so many people try so hard to be apologists for Belkar. He's unabashedly Evil, and he's arguably funnier in many respects than most of the rest of the OOTS.

Why is that so hard for people to accept, I wonder?

Belkar is Evil. So what?

No way is he L/E, and I'm not sure he is "batS$%t crazy" enough for C/E. So... N/E?

Belkar's evilness isn't a flaw... its a perk. :p
 

Drowbane said:
Belkar is Evil. So what?

No way is he L/E, and I'm not sure he is "batS$%t crazy" enough for C/E. So... N/E?

Belkar's evilness isn't a flaw... its a perk. :p
Considering that Belkar is content (maybe not happy, well obviously not happy) to work with Roy & the gang and do "good deeds" and stuff with them, hang out with them, not stab them for fun and all... I'd say he's extremely Neutral Evil. He's evil at the level that's convenient and amusing at any given time. :)
 


Drowbane said:
Belkar is Evil. So what?

No way is he L/E, and I'm not sure he is "batS$%t crazy" enough for C/E. So... N/E?

Belkar's evilness isn't a flaw... its a perk. :p
He stated he was Chaotic when the lawyers tried to serve him a summons...
 

Elephant said:
Not really, no. If you wish to point a finger of blame for an alignment debate, look in the mirror while you do so.
"Abandoned" means was there, but now? Not so much. Instead, here. No ducking of blame.

Cheers, -- N
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top