Opening can o' worms

I'd suggest a product couldn't be entered in more than one of the "content" categories: Best Adventure or Best Supplement or Best Campaign/Campaign Supplement or Best Adversary/Monster Product. The publisher, or the judges, would have to select which categorie fit best for a product.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

My suggestions for categories (to deal with the large books) would be:
Adventures: Anything that characters are expected to gain 5 or fewer levels.
Campaigns: Large adventures where characters are expected to gain more than 5 levels.
Campaign Settings: Large books that may contain adventures, or not.

So ( I own none of these but am basing this sorting on what I've read about them)
Shackled City == Campaign
Potolus == Campaign Setting
DCC #35 == Campaign Setting
Most other DCC stuff == Adventure
Rappan Atthauk == Campaign

The other bits:
1. I think the nomination of judges has mostly worked. The voting for the judges is a really good ieda.
2. Keep the d20 category.
4. I kinda like this idea for a split, it means that something like a tshirt won't win over a dm screen. And the judges won't have to consider which is better of those two - I mean how the heck do you compare them...
6. As for the evaluation methods - I'm not sure how things are evaluated right now.
-cpd

-cpd
 

To prevent one book from winning in multiple categories, the evaluation criteria of each category should be specific enough to make it unlikely for that book to win. For example:

Campaign / Campaign Supplements: Content should be organized by categories such as maps, inhabitants, dangers, organizations, etc. The ease with which each section of content can be uitilized into a role playing campaign is one of the most important facets. The quality and originality of content is important as well.

Adventures: Content should be provided to allow easy adaptation and quick use. The content should be organized to best facilitate reference as the adventure progresses. The quality and originality of content is important as well.

Thus, is some publisher figures out how to make a single product both a great Campaign Supplement and an Adventure, congradulations! They deserve two awards! But more than likely, its best if used in one form or the other.
 

I think that there should be a mutual exclusivity clause WRT Adventures and Campaigns and Campaign Settings. I think Campaign Setting and Campaigns should be separate categories. Shackled City, Rappan Athuk, would both be campaigns even though they have setting material. Wilderlands and DCC World would be Campaign Settings. When a product is submitted for any of these, the submitter can only choose one of these categories for the product.
 

1. I like the system in place just fine.
2. Keep the D20 Category.
3. I think if it qualifies to be in several categories then let it.
4. I like this idea but it may cause headaches in the future.
5. Fine as is.
6. Whatever the judges see fit.
 

I wish there was a way to keep people from voting from their home, then the library, then their work, then their aunts house, then their fathers house, then their cousins house, then their neighbors house, etc...
 

I think at least one of the Judges should be picked at random somehow. I mean, basically it is a popularity contest, and a more random selection would get a more diverse viewpoint in there.
 

When it comes to judge selection, I think its a fairly good system as it is. The only real change I think should be made is, as was suggested above, have the voting blind so that people can't see the results and vote accordingly.
 

About the judges and judge selection

This is some info culled from posts from other boards/forums:

The judges for the 2006, as in past years' awards, were selected from amongst EN World members by EN World members in a publicly-viewed poll-style post.

This year we're changing that, so that anyone can throw in their hat, anyone can cast their secret vote (IP addresses will be tracked to reduce cheating), and the tabulation will be via single transferrable vote. Our brilliant programmers are setting it up to give us a list of the top ten candidates, then the Board of Directors will have to choose the top five that meet all the requirements including ensuring that we have at least one experienced judge on the panel (to ensure some continuity and guidance) and one new face (to avoid stagnation and predictability). I anticipate the elections taking place in late September to early October.

A potential judge can nominate herself (I'm hoping to have nomination threads on EN World, The Forge, and RPG.Net, depending upon the moderatorships of each of the boards), but she needs to receive a second to get on the ballot. If someone nominates another person, that person must accept the nomination. In either case, the nominee must certify that they meet the selection criteria and agree to abide by the guidelines as set forth below, and by the Board.

Basic requirements of the judges include:
  • No affiliation with an RPG publisher in the past year, nor reasonable expectation of the same over the course of the following year. This includes writing credits, being a formally-recognized volunteer, etc. This largely stems from the fact that these are fan awards, not industry awards, so we want the judges to be fans. Having professional credits in the past is fine, and can be quite handy, but we also don't want any potential for accusations of conflict of interest.
  • Being 18 years of age or older.
  • Ability to read and write in English and communicate on a regular basis online
  • Signing and upholding of a code of conduct and non-disclosure agreement. An important part of the code is the clause that should a judge be disqualified for noncompliance or neglect, said judge is responsible for all charges related to shipping product to their replacement
  • Ability to pay for any duties on products shipped to them (it has happened, especially for non-US resident judges)
  • Willingness and ability to sacrifice literally thousands of hours fairly evaluating hundreds of products
  • No impairments that would prevent proper evaluation of all submitted products including but not limited to: music CDs, books, PDFs, dice, software, etc.
  • Participation in intense discussions and the ability to check in on the judges discussions every 48 hours in late June and early July

Judges receive somewhere around 4-8 boxes full of books and other RPG products which they need to evaluate, but then keep or dispose of as they see fit once the nominations have been announced.

They receive a free 4-day pass to Gen Con Indy and a spot in one of the staff hotel rooms (shared with 3 other people) for three nights.

If judges can make it to Gen Con Indy and avail themselves of the free pass and/or room, they are expected to man the ENnies booth for at least one shift and while at Gen Con, if wearing the ENnies badge, to represent the Awards in a professional, dignified and impartial (ie. no wearing publisher merchandise) manner.

Usually judges take at least one week off work to be able to completely evaluate all the products. Since we are starting the submission period far earlier this year, though, we anticipate there being less of a time-crunch. I already have one full box of exciting product ready to ship just from the stuff I picked up from Gen Con, so judges would be kept in reading material from that alone until Christmas, I suspect!

The way things will work this year:
  • After election and the proper paperwork signing is done, we list each judge's address on the ENnies web site. This is an unfortunately necessary loss of privacy so the publishers can ship product directly to each judge. Publishers using courriers may requeste a phone number, but I will not post those publicly. Publishers send product directly to each judge, and submit an entry form to me. We used to offer a central shipping option, but since one entire box got eaten on its way from the Submission Coordinator's house by the US Postal Disservice, we are reducing our liability (and eliminating the entry/shipping fee).
  • The judges each evaluate the product received. This year I'm issuing a 1/3 of a page product tracker that has a score of 1-10 for Cartography, Cover Art, Interiour Art, Writing, Rules, Production values, Type of Book, and Overall, with room for comments. This will help judges keep track of what they liked and disliked about each product, and be a useful memory jog come nomination time. Each judge has their own values and criteria by which a product is evaluated, but at least this can help beginner judges get a handle on what we look for. The numeric scores aren't used for anything other than personal reference.
    There is a private, judges-only forum where they can discuss what they liked or didn't like about individual products which you can take or leave. Judges are expected to check in at least once a week during the submissions period to track what they've received.
  • The submission period closes in early to mid-June. A few weeks later, I expect the judge product nominations. These will be emailed to me, and the Board will tabulate the results. For most categories, judges pick five products which they assign a full point, and one product they give a half point. We tally the scores and the five highest rankers get nominations, the sixth place an honourable mention. In the cases of ties, we have a run-off vote.
  • Then we announce the nominees, encourage the publishers to put up samples of their work so voters can familiarize themselves with the product, then a week or two later we open the polls for two weeks. Tabulation is via the alternative/instant runoff vote, which is quite nicely explained on the ENnies web site.
  • The winners are announced at a gala ceremony on the Friday of Gen Con Indy.
 

trancejeremy said:
I think at least one of the Judges should be picked at random somehow. I mean, basically it is a popularity contest, and a more random selection would get a more diverse viewpoint in there.

I'd think we very much don't want to pick random judges. We want to pick judges with good judgement. And, as I think was first pointed out by Teflon Billy, one generally becomes popular around here in large part because your views on gaming are representative of a goodly segment of the community.
 

Remove ads

Top