Gez said:
I'm French, I like bicycle riding, but I'm never interested in sportive events, tour de France included.
In fact, there are [edit] three things I reproach to that competition.
As a lover of cycling, and one who finds it this time of year bittersweet, being now unable to participate in my favorite athletic activity, I've got to express strong resistance to the arguments I've heard time and time by would-be detractors from cycling.
The first is that it's more about pharmacetics than about cycling.
The drug problem is really a nationalism-meets-sour-grapes problem. Drug allegations are casually bandied about every time some country thinks it's prized cyclist/team should have won a given race, and are more often disproven than proven. Cycling has more extensive drug testing than most other sports, and it has more severe penalties than most as well.
The second, little known, thing, is that it was created by an anti-dreyfusard.
If we opposed everything that was founded by someone with reproachable morals, we would be left with contemplating the universe beneath a bodhi tree. Not to mention we would all be morally required to turn in uprising against our own nations, boycott nearly all commercial interests, and subject ourselves to ascetic self-punishment.
[/B]The third, that I nearly forgot, is that the current organisators of cycling events are blocking all innovations in the bicycle sector. They only accept the same old classic bike, while more efficient designs have been made (the speed record with a non-conventionnal bike is 130 km/h!). And because of them, we don't see these new, better bikes in stores. Grrr. [/B]
I don't see that as a bad thing. This is an athletic event, not an engineering competition. Besides, we really don't need to see these guys going even faster--there's plenty of injury at current speeds.
Personally, I think that their position is good for cycling because it promotes cycling over cycles. They don't categorically eschew all innovations; but they are very conservative and consciencious about preserving the sport as an athletic competition rather than letting it degenerate into another "richest-man-wins" schtick.
All that said, "Go Lance!!!!"