Tiefling
First Post
Ilen said:
An ad in a magazine interrupts what I am doing as they attempt to sell me a product. It is valid in response to the post I responded to. He said nothing about telemarketers, simply people who interrupt your life to sell you something, which is what ads do by nature; they grab your time and attention and try to persuade you into buying something.
Of course an spot on TV isn’t the same as a telemarketer, people don’t overreact to the former.
I think it would be good to summarize why this is an invalid argument.

1. Advertisements on television, radio, or in a magazine are paying for the service that they're in. If they were not there, the network/magazine would have to charge more, and in the case of radio or broadcast TV, that's impossible. However, telemarketers are not contributing to my phone service. Likewise, if someone were to hack into the TV network or radio station and place an ad in without paying the appropriate people for that privilege, I'd be noticably upset.
2. Advertisements on television or radio, and to a large extent in magazines, are placed at convenient spots. The TV commercial comes after an acceptable break in the show, a radio commercial after a song or news story is finished, and in magazines most advertisements are between articles. Telemarketers, however, call whenever they feel like, frequently at inconvenient times, such as dinner or a nap, thus interrupting whatever I'm doing and forcing me to pick up the phone and see who it is (no, nobody forced me at gunpoint to answer, but it could be someone who I actually want/need to talk to). Continuing the previous example, if the hacker put his illegal ad in the middle of some action on TV or in the middle of a song or news story, I'd be VERY upset. Even if the ad was legitimate, I'd be very upset.