Furn_Darkside
First Post
RangerWickett said:
Man, I never realized before how much this movie offends me.
But...have they replaced the dinosaur teeth with flashlights, yet?
FD
RangerWickett said:
Man, I never realized before how much this movie offends me.
RangerWickett said:Oh, and now they're going to kill off the nephew of Hammond, just because he has good business sense and wants to kill the rampaging monster. But nooooooooo, he wants to harm the pretty animals (that killed dozens of people). He deserves to be killed by the T-Rex too, because of course Hollywood people care more about saving the environment than about making money. They're nothing like the In-Gen folks.
Wolf72 said:okay ( i read the book long ago), but how did everyone the ship get killed? ...
rounser said:The Shadow Druids from the 2E Complete Druid book fit your description. Evil extremists who place no value in the lives of people, but will deliver pre-emptive strikes against those they consider threatening to the land, and will exact far more than an eye for an eye towards those who actually harm it. They make excellent villains.
RangerWickett said:I'm watching Jurassic Park II on FOX right now, and I'm just reminded of how much that photographer/eco-terrorist guy really peeved me off. The whole problem of the movie is to be blamed on him, simply because he'd rather get dozens of people killed off, instead of letting proper channels of protest and law handle his concerns. He lets all those dinos free because he doesn't want to see them in a zoo, but if not for him, dozens of people get torn to pieces, trampled, or eaten.
And he feels so happy about it. The movie never even shows the guy being punished for what he did. If I'd directed the movie, the guy would've been sued by InGen several dozen times over, until he was forced to live in a zoo himself just so he could get food to eat. Punk.
Heretic Apostate said:Sheesh....
Anyway, the book was better than the movie. They totally hashed the plot of the book.
...