nopantsyet
First Post
How about any word used improperly? I would also like to ban the useless banning of words based on a poor understanding of the English language. For example:
session, n. An assembly of people for a common purpose or because of a common interest.
gathering, n. An assembly of persons; a meeting.
I would say that if there is to be any banning of words, it should be words which have been misappropriated and purported clever usages rather than just a critique of others' choice of verbiage.
For example, I agree completely with the banning of "fluff," because it carries the connotation of triviality, as in:
fluff, n. Something of little substance or consequence, especially light or superficial entertainment.
So it's an inherently biased term, and its gaming usage was probably in fact coined by somebody who feels it is inferior to so-called "crunch." (Which term, by the way, I have no problem with.) But crunch and its complement should form some sort of synergistic whole, and not definitionally ascribe a particular value judgement.
session, n. An assembly of people for a common purpose or because of a common interest.
gathering, n. An assembly of persons; a meeting.
I would say that if there is to be any banning of words, it should be words which have been misappropriated and purported clever usages rather than just a critique of others' choice of verbiage.
For example, I agree completely with the banning of "fluff," because it carries the connotation of triviality, as in:
fluff, n. Something of little substance or consequence, especially light or superficial entertainment.
So it's an inherently biased term, and its gaming usage was probably in fact coined by somebody who feels it is inferior to so-called "crunch." (Which term, by the way, I have no problem with.) But crunch and its complement should form some sort of synergistic whole, and not definitionally ascribe a particular value judgement.