pegasuses, pegasae?


log in or register to remove this ad

English usually follows latin rules for plurals of "us" words. So I'd say pegasi.

Originally it was a proper name, not a word intended to plural.
 


Yep, pegasi.

Although supposedly one of the guidelines for monster creation in 3e is that the plural end in -s or -es. There are only a few exceptions to this now (pegasi, slaad).
 


"Pegasus" is the Latin spelling, and its plural would naturally be "Pegasi" -- except that "Pegasus" was a proper name. The Greek name, in Roman characters, is "Pegasos". (I'm not sure what the Greek plural of "Pegasos" would be.)

By the way, in English, we like to pronounce "-i" as "eye", but it should be pronounced my like "-y" -- pay-gahssooss becomes pay-gahssy.
 

the Jester said:
Yep, pegasi.

Although supposedly one of the guidelines for monster creation in 3e is that the plural end in -s or -es. There are only a few exceptions to this now (pegasi, slaad).

add janni, djinni, and efreeti to your list.
 


mmadsen said:
"Pegasus" is the Latin spelling, and its plural would naturally be "Pegasi" -- except that "Pegasus" was a proper name. The Greek name, in Roman characters, is "Pegasos". (I'm not sure what the Greek plural of "Pegasos" would be.)

Pegasoi would be the Greek plural.
 

If in doubt, form a regular English plural (i.e. "Pegasuses" in this case). Don't take any notice of classics snobs telling you otherwise - so few people know Greek and Latin these days that expecting the application of their irregular plural formation on obscure English words is just stupid. Same goes for the split infinitive "rule", which is just a misguided attempt to apply Latin verb rules to English words.
 

Remove ads

Top