Chu Li
First Post
When looking at recent D&D products I can't help seeing an overall increase in power.
That might be necessary in order to keep the game interesting, so I'm ok with that.
What really bugs me though is the (sometimes radical) difference between classes.
I'm specifically referring to the Hexblade and the Duskblade.
I really like the Hexblade, allthough it appears quite low-powered to me.
But in direct comparison the Duskblade is a 1-A Skyrocket. IMHO the Duskblade dwarves almost ANY other class. (2 strong saves, d8 HD, strong BA, INT for (spont.) spell-casting, spell prog from 1st lvl, lots of directly useful spells, ability to quicken spells, martial weapon prof, shield prof, all armors, potential to cast spells while fully armored and lots of other goodies).
Thematically both classes are similar, i.e. they're both arcane fighters, but power-wise there are worlds between them. Why is that?
Thpfft!
Chu Li
P.S. plz send remedy
That might be necessary in order to keep the game interesting, so I'm ok with that.
What really bugs me though is the (sometimes radical) difference between classes.
I'm specifically referring to the Hexblade and the Duskblade.
I really like the Hexblade, allthough it appears quite low-powered to me.
But in direct comparison the Duskblade is a 1-A Skyrocket. IMHO the Duskblade dwarves almost ANY other class. (2 strong saves, d8 HD, strong BA, INT for (spont.) spell-casting, spell prog from 1st lvl, lots of directly useful spells, ability to quicken spells, martial weapon prof, shield prof, all armors, potential to cast spells while fully armored and lots of other goodies).
Thematically both classes are similar, i.e. they're both arcane fighters, but power-wise there are worlds between them. Why is that?
Thpfft!

Chu Li
P.S. plz send remedy